Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906174›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

On the outside looking in: a phenomenological study of the lived experience of Australian adults with a disorder of the corpus callosum.

Maree Maxfield, Monica S Cooper, Anne Kavanagh, Alexandra Devine, Liz Gill Atkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How does the subjective well-being of Australian adults with a congenital corpus callosum disorder compare with that of the general Australian population?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maree MaxfieldCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. m.maxfield@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-494X
Monica S CooperNeurodevelopment and Disability, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia.
Anne KavanaghMelbourne Disability Institute, Melbourne School Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Alexandra DevineDisability and Health Unit|Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Liz Gill AtkinsonCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile classified as a rare condition, a congenital disorder of the corpus callosum (DCC) is one of the most commonly identified brain anomalies in newborns, occurring in 1:4000 live births. Advances in imaging techniques have improved early diagnosis for children, yet adults with a DCC-who may present with extreme heterogeneity in cause and impact-often experience challenges in receiving a definitive diagnosis and accessing appropriate services and supports. To date, the dearth of evidence documenting the lived experiences of adults with DCC has made it difficult to determine adequate policy and service responses. This exploratory research aims to address this gap by presenting the first qualitative examination of the experiences and impact of complete or partial agenesis of the corpus callosum among adults.

resultsEight face-to-face interviews were conducted with Australian adults, aged 23-72 years, to explore their lived experience. Data was collected in four Australian states from June to August 2017. Thematic and interpretive analyses were employed to analyse data. Three emergent themes described difficulties related to: (1) reactions to the diagnosis; (2) access to supports and key life domains, and (3) identifying as an adult. Interview analysis described lived experiences typically outlining a lifetime of exclusion and misunderstanding from family, educators and disability and health support services.

conclusionsThis paper contributes to filling the knowledge gap around a rare congenital brain disorder affecting the lives of adults. Findings confirm a considerable lack of information and support for adults living with corpus callosum disorders. Greater professional and societal understanding is needed to improve access to the key life domains of education, employment and social inclusion for adults with a DCC. To instigate truly effective change, social research must tackle the issues of applicability and impact to alter the dominance of uninformed practices, hindered by prevailing myths. This research paves the way for further phenomenological studies in which participant narrative is vital. Further research will elicit stronger policy and service responses for all current and emerging adults with a DCC.

Indexed as

Nervous System MalformationsPersons with DisabilitiesAdultAgedAgenesis of Corpus CallosumAustraliaChildCorpus CallosumHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedYoung AdultAdultsAgenesis of the corpus callosumCorpus callosumDisabilityHeterogeneityHidden disabilityLived experiencePhenomenologyRare disease

Identifiers

PMID34906174
PMCPMC8670101
OpenAlexW4226097329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.