Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906129›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Third birth intention of the childbearing-age population in mainland China and sociodemographic differences: a cross-sectional survey.

Zhang Yan, Lin Hui, Jiang Wenbin, Lu Liuxue, Li Yuemei, Lv Bohan, Wei Lili

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhang YanFaculty, Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Lin HuiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Jiang WenbinDepartment of Nursing and Hospital Infection Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Lu LiuxueDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, 533000, China.
Li YuemeiDepartment of Nursing, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, 810007, China.
Lv BohanSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China.
Wei LiliDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16# Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China. weilili@qduhospital.cn.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities · CNQinghai Provincial Peoples Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal fertility declines have become an inevitable trend, and many countries are adopting policies to drive fertility increases. Fertility intention plays an important role in predicting fertility behavior. The Chinese government has recently issued the 'three-child' policy, and there is still little research on the third birth intention of the childbearing-age population. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and related reasons of third birth intention in the childbearing-age population in mainland China, and analyze the sociodemographic differences.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted in mainland China from June to July 2021. A total of 15,332 childbearing-age participants responded and completed the Fertility Intention Questionnaire online through the Wenjuanxing Platform. Data were explored and analyzed by SPSS (version 22.0) software. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the current situation and reasons of third birth intention. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influencing factors in the sociodemographic level.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 32.9 ± 5.94 years. Only 12.2% of participants reported having third birth intention. The subjective norm of having both son and daughter (22.0%) and busy at work (29.2%) accounted for the largest proportion in the reasons of acceptance and rejection, respectively. Age has negative impact on third birth intention (OR = 0.960). Men were 2.209 times more likely to have three children than women (P < 0.001). With the improvement of education and family monthly income, the birth intention shows a downward trend. Compared with Han nationalities, first marriage and city residents, the ethnic minorities, remarriage and rural residents have stronger birth intention (all P < 0.05). And individuals with two existing children are inclined to have the third child (OR = 1.839).

conclusionThe third birth intention in the childbearing-age population in China is still low after the announcement of the three-child policy. It is necessary to create a favorable fertility context for childbearing-age group with high level of third birth intention, like younger, male, minority, remarriage, with lower education and family monthly income, living in rural and two existing children. Furthermore, removing barriers for those unintended is also prominent to ensure the impetus of policy.

Indexed as

FertilityIntentionAdultBirth RateChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleMarriagePopulation DynamicsRural PopulationChildbearing-ageInfluencing factorsThird birth intention

Identifiers

PMID34906129
PMCPMC8670058
OpenAlexW4200199059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.