Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906125›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2021

Effectiveness of virtual simulation and jaw model for undergraduate periodontal teaching.

Jie Zhang, Jiawei Xing, Min Zheng, Jie Sheng, Kailiang Zhang, Baoping Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Bridging Theory and Practice in Periodontal Education: Implementation and Evaluation of the PERIO-Blended Learning Framework.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Do Pre-Clinical Summative Assessments Predict a Student's Clinical Performance? A Retrospective Study.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie Zhang *School of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jiawei Xing *School of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Min Zheng *School of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jie ShengSchool of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kailiang ZhangSchool of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. zhangkl@lzu.edu.cn.
Baoping ZhangSchool of Stomatology Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. zhangbp@lzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study explored the effect of virtual simulation and jaw model on development of preclinical periodontal skills in undergraduate students. The study also sought to explore effectiveness of VR in periodontal preclinical training and determine adequate performance mode in basic periodontal education to improve future preclinical training strategies.

methodsSixty volunteer sophomores and juniors from the stomatology department in Lanzhou university were enrolled to the current study. Participants were randomly assigned into four groups (each group, n = 15) including the traditional jaw model group (Group J) which was the control group, virtual reality group (Group V), virtual-jaw group (Group V-J), and jaw-virtual group (Group J-V). Participants received training on uniform basic periodontal knowledge before completing the first theoretical assessment. Participants further underwent a total 8 h of operation training and completed a second theoretical assessment. Performance of participants was evaluated using the supragingival scaling processes, and clinical operation scores were graded by a blinded professional using an established standard scoring system.

resultsThe findings showed no significant difference in the first theoretical outcomes between the four groups (P > 0.05). The scores of the second theoretical assessment were significantly improved for the V-J and J-V groups (60.00 ± 4.47, 58.33 ± 4.35) compared with the scores of the first theoretical exam (49.67 ± 4.81, 48.00 ± 4.93, P < 0.05). The operation process scores of students in Group V-J and J-V (72.00 ± 5.92; 70.00 ± 3.05) were significantly higher compared with the scores in the other two groups (V: 61.67 ± 7.85; J: 60.67 ± 2.58). The scaling process performance of students in Group V-J and J-V (53.00 ± 3.05; 63.40 ± 4.39) was improved compared with that of students in the other two groups (V: 41.90 ± 5.23; J: 47.40 ± 4.31).

conclusionThe findings show that combination of virtual reality and jaw model during periodontal preclinical training increases students' grades and improves acquiring of professional skills. Findings from the current study indicate that the jaw model should be applied prior to virtual reality to ensure high efficacy.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationEducational MeasurementHumansStudentsDental educationPeriodontologyVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID34906125
PMCPMC8672555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.