Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906096›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Biphasic pattern in the effect of severe measles infection; the difference between additive and multiplicative scale.

Nhat Thanh Hoang Le, Nhan Thi Ho, Bryan Grenfell, Stephen Baker, Ronald B Geskus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nhat Thanh Hoang LeOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. nhatlth@oucru.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-7217
Nhan Thi HoOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Bryan GrenfellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Stephen BakerCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ronald B GeskusOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
National Institutes of Health · USOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBVinmec International Hospital · VN

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106680/B/14/ZWellcome Trust 106680/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with measles virus (MeV) causes immunosuppression and increased susceptibility to other infectious diseases. Only few studies reported a duration of immunosuppression, with varying results. We investigated the effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of hospital admissions for infectious diseases in Vietnamese children.

methodsWe used retrospective data (2005 to 2015; N = 4419) from the two pediatric hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We compared the age-specific incidence of hospital admission for infectious diseases before and after hospitalization for measles. We fitted a Poisson regression model that included gender, current age, and time since measles to obtain a multiplicative effect measure. Estimates were transformed to the additive scale.

resultsWe observed two phases in the incidence of hospital admission after measles. The first phase started with a fourfold increased rate of admissions during the first month after measles, dropping to a level quite comparable to children of the same age before measles. In the second phase, lasting until at least 6 years after measles, the admission rate decreased further, with values up to 20 times lower than in children of the same age before measles. However, on the additive scale the effect size in the second phase was much smaller than in the first phase.

conclusionThe first phase highlights the public health benefits of measles vaccination by preventing measles and immune amnesia. The beneficial second phase is interesting, but its strength strongly depends on the scale. It suggests a complicated interaction between MeV infection and the host immunity.

Indexed as

MeaslesChildHospitalizationHumansIncidenceInfantMeasles virusRetrospective StudiesAdditive scaleHospitalizationImmunosuppressionInfectious diseasesMeaslesMultiplicative scale

Identifiers

PMID34906096
PMCPMC8670196
OpenAlexW4200055665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.