Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905991›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

A Framework for Evaluating Social Determinants of Health Screening and Referrals for Assistance.

Kevin Chagin, Franklin Choate, Karen Cook, Susan Fuehrer, James E Misak, Ashwini R Sehgal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health Related Social Needs Screening and Referral Fulfillment: Toward a Complex Model.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patients' Willingness to Accept Social Needs Navigation After In-Person versus Remote Screening.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  12. The 'PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clustering of Social Determinants of Health Among Patients.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin ChaginThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-9419
Franklin ChoateThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Karen CookThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Susan FuehrerThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
James E MisakThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ashwini R SehgalThe MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-2731

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

objectivesMany health systems screen patients for social determinants of health and refer patients with social needs to community service organizations for assistance. We developed a framework based on sequential steps to evaluate this process.

methodsWe reviewed efforts by The MetroHealth System in Cleveland, Ohio and identified 6 sequential steps: patient screened, has social needs, consents to referral to a service organization, referral placed, referral accepted, and referral outcome. Referral outcomes were categorized as resolved (organization provided requested service or patient self-resolved problem), or unresolved (patient unable to be contacted or declined assistance). We then determined the numbers of patients with food insecurity who completed each step, how completion differed by patient characteristics and service organization, and reasons for failure to complete specific steps.

resultsWe used the framework to evaluate screening and assistance steps among 5741 patients who attended a COVID-19 vaccine clinic from February 15-March 31, 2021 and were followed through April 30, 2021. The percentage of patients who completed each step ranged from 17-98%. Step completion differed by patient age, patient race, and clinic. Of 360 referrals accepted by community organizations, 98 (27%) were resolved. The most common reasons for unresolved referrals were inability of service organization to contact patients (151), no reason stated (71), and patients declined service (30).

conclusionsA framework based on sequential steps may be used to evaluate social determinants of health screening and assistance programs. Further work is needed to address reasons for failure to complete steps, to include patient perspectives, and to determine long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Social Determinants of HealthCOVID-19 Vaccinesfood insecuritysocial determinantssocial services

Identifiers

PMID34905991
PMCPMC8679017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.