Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905785›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Digital Health Literacy of the Population in Germany: Results of the HLS-GER 2].

Doris Schaeffer, Svea Gille, Eva-Maria Berens, Lennert Griese, Julia Klinger, Dominique Vogt, Klaus Hurrelmann

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Relevance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for health services research and practice - Part II].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Telemedicine in the rehabilitation of older people living at home].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Doris SchaefferFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften; Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Svea GilleFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften; Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Eva-Maria BerensFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften; Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Lennert GrieseFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften; Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Julia KlingerInstitut für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Dominique VogtFakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft; Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Klaus HurrelmannPublic Health and Education, Hertie School - University of Governance, Berlin, Deutschland.
Bielefeld University · DECologne Institute for Economic Research · DEHertie School · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit gefördert 1504 Titel 54401Bundesministerium für Gesundheit gefördert ZMV I 1-2518 004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWhile the availability and variety of digital information on health offers a range of opportunities, they also pose a number of challenges, because the need for digital health literacy (DHL) is increasing along with the growing range of information possibilities. The aim of this study was to analyze the extent of DHL in the German population, key determinants, and consequences for the use of digital health information resources. METHODOLOGY: The analysis was based on data from the Second Health Literacy Survey Germany (HLS-GER 2), consisting of a representative sample of n=2,151. A questionnaire developed as part of the international comparative study HLS

resultsOverall, 75.8% of the population had low DHL. In particular, low literacy skills, older age, a lower level of education and social status were associated with low DHL. Multivariate analysis also indicated a strong association between DHL and general health literacy (HL). Low DHL led to lower use of digital health information resources.

conclusionThe results underscore the importance of promoting DHL in the general population and especially among groups with low DHL. Efforts in this area should include general HL, as it is closely related to DHL. Strengthening DHL is also a socially important task in order to increase the still low use of digital health information resources in Germany and, in general, to meet the increasing digitalization of the health care system.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyDelivery of Health CareGermanyHealth SurveysHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34905785
PMCPMC11248737
OpenAlexW4200449789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.