Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905711›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Female in-nest attendance predicts the number of ectoparasites in Darwin's finch species.

Sonia Kleindorfer, Lauren K Common, Jody A O'Connor, Jefferson Garcia-Loor, Andrew C Katsis, Rachael Y Dudaniec, Diane Colombelli-Négrel, Nico M Adreani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Good guardian, bad parent: tradeoffs between territory defense and parental care in Darwin's finches.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sonia KleindorferCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-3122
Lauren K CommonCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Jody A O'ConnorDepartment for Environment and Water, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Jefferson Garcia-LoorKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition and Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Andrew C KatsisCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Rachael Y DudaniecDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Diane Colombelli-NégrelCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Nico M AdreaniKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition and Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-0389
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Vienna · ATCharles Darwin Foundation · ECMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection should act on parental care and favour parental investment decisions that optimize the number of offspring produced. Such predictions have been robustly tested in predation risk contexts, but less is known about alternative functions of parental care under conditions of parasitism. The avian vampire fly (

Indexed as

FinchesMuscidaeParasitesPasseriformesAnimalsEcuadorFemaleLarvaMalebrood careectoparasiteincubationnest guardingparental carePhilornis downsi

Identifiers

PMID34905711
PMCPMC8670954
OpenAlexW4200280652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.