ArticleHealth promotion international2021
Capacity building in participatory stakeholder groups: results from a German research consortium on active lifestyles.
Article in Health promotion international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory health research and promotion with children in Germany: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and results of the German National Strategy for the Promotion of Breastfeeding: a participatory process.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A pragmatic strength and conditioning intervention for firefighters: Feasibility of the Tactical Athlete Resilience Program (TARP).Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023Article
- Cooperative planning and its utilization in German physical activity promotion: a brief introduction.Health promotion international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To implement sustainable health-promoting structures in a setting, various agents must work together. In the Capital4Health research network, participatory stakeholder groups consisting of key persons, stakeholders, representatives of the target group, and facilitating experts are assembled in five settings (child care center, school, company, rural community, nursing home). In a Cooperative Planning process, the various groups meet regularly to plan and implement strategies to promote physical activity across different settings. This study evaluates whether participatory stakeholder groups have been established and also examines the capacity-building processes that took place in these stakeholder groups. For process evaluation, 78 group meetings were documented in 16 different stakeholder groups using a semi-structured protocol based on established capacity-building domains. For outcome evaluation, six semi-structured interviews (1-2 per setting) with facilitating experts were conducted. Data were analyzed by content analysis. Across all settings, capacity-building processes were successful to a certain degree (e.g. problem assessment, resource mobilization). However, in most groups it was difficult to broadly assess problems, to establish sustainable networks, or to find persons with leadership characteristics. Also, irregular participation, lack of motivation to take over responsibility, and minimal institutional readiness for structural and personal changes often hindered the progress of the projects. Stakeholder groups can actively involve setting members in the development of physical activity promotion programs. It seems challenging, however, to sustainably establish such groups that continue working independently without assistance from a facilitating expert.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.