Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905608›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2021

Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects.

Peter C Gelius, Raluca M Sommer, Karim Abu-Omar, Valentin Schätzlein, Marc Suhrcke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [DNVF Memorandum: Objectives and Methods of Physical Activity-Related Health Services Research].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter C GeliusDepartment for Sports Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-4996
Raluca M SommerDepartment for Sports Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-6658
Karim Abu-OmarDepartment for Sports Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-7013
Valentin SchätzleinDepartment for Sports Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Marc SuhrckeCentre for Health Economics (CHE), University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELuxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research · LU

Funding

CAP COM 01EL1421ACapital4Health 01EL1421AHGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health promotion increasingly employs participatory approaches, but the question arises whether the likely higher costs of participation also translate into greater benefits. This article takes a first step toward a full health economic evaluation by comprehensively reporting the costs of a specific participatory approach, Cooperative Planning, in a German research consortium to promote physical activity. We conducted a costing analysis of Cooperative Planning at 22 sites across six settings. Project teams used a custom template to record resource use. We calculated average costs per meeting, site and setting using the opportunity costs approach, and obtained feedback from participating researchers. A total of 144 planning meetings with an average of nine participants were conducted. Costs per meeting varied significantly across settings. Differences were mostly attributable to varying meeting duration, preparation time and numbers of participants. Across settings, human resources accounted for roughly 95% of the costs. Implementing researchers reported challenges regarding the logic and methods of the health economic analysis. A participatory approach to physical activity promotion may cause substantially varying costs in different settings despite similar cost structures. However, their value for money could turn out comparably favorable if (and only if) the expected benefits is indeed forthcoming. Despite some challenges implementing the costing exercise into the logistics of ongoing participatory projects, this analysis may pave the way toward a full health economic evaluation, and the template may be useful to future participatory health promotion projects.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPopulation GroupsResearch Personnelcooperative planningcostinghealth economicsparticipatory approachesphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID34905608
PMCPMC8670626
OpenAlexW4200081696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.