Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905459›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)2022

Developing innovative treatment technologies for PFAS-containing wastes.

Chelsea Berg, Brian Crone, Brian Gullett, Mark Higuchi, Max J Krause, Paul M Lemieux, Todd Martin, Erin P Shields, Ed Struble, Eben Thoma and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Review of PFAS Destruction Technologies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chelsea BergOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-5911
Brian CroneOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-4367
Brian GullettOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-4026
Mark HiguchiOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-2369
Max J KrauseOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8582-5826
Paul M LemieuxOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6408-3368
Todd MartinOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Erin P ShieldsOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9335-1074
Ed StrubleOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Eben ThomaOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1372-4369
Andrew WhitehillOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5996-8217

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment is a major concern for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). To complement its ongoing research efforts addressing PFAS contamination, the U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) commissioned the PFAS Innovative Treatment Team (PITT) to provide new perspectives on treatment and disposal of high priority PFAS-containing wastes. During its six-month tenure, the team was charged with identifying and developing promising solutions to destroy PFAS. The PITT examined emerging technologies for PFAS waste treatment and selected four technologies for further investigation. These technologies included mechanochemical treatment, electrochemical oxidation, gasification and pyrolysis, and supercritical water oxidation. This paper highlights these four technologies and discusses their prospects and the development needed before potentially becoming available solutions to address PFAS-contaminated waste.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID34905459
PMCPMC9316338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.