Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021
Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine co-administered with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and live-attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine: a phase 4, single-center, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine coadministered with trivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine: A phase 4, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in China.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Enterovirus 71 Vaccines in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2026Review
- The strategies and mechanisms of enteroviruses to evade innate immunity and the vaccine progress of enteroviruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Research progress on pathogenic and therapeutic mechanisms of Enterovirus A71.Archives of virology · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-administration of vaccines could be an efficient strategy to increase vaccination uptake and reduce the number of clinic visits. This randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine co-administered with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and live-attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine (LA-JEV). A total of 372 healthy infants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive simultaneous administration of EV71 vaccine (dose 1) and MMR on d 0 and EV71 vaccine (dose 2) and LA-JEV on d 30 (Group 1); administration of MMR and LA-JEV on d 0 and 30, respectively (Group 2); or administration of doses 1 and 2 of EV71 vaccine on d 0 and 30, respectively (Group 3). The non-inferiority analysis of the seroconversion for EV71 neutralizing antibody after vaccination was the primary outcome. According to per protocol set, antibody response against EV71, measles, mumps, rubella, and Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus was similar regardless of administration schedule. After vaccination, the seroconversion rate of EV71 neutralizing antibody in Group 1 (107 [97.27%] of 110) was non-inferior to that in Group 3 (109 [97.32%] of 112; difference - 0.05% [95% CI - 5.38 to 5.21]). The incidences of adverse reactions were 62.60% (77/123) in Group 1, 54.84% (68/124) in Group 2, and 37.70% (46/122) in Group 3, and most of them were mild to moderate in severity. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. In total, the co-administration of combined EV71 vaccine with MMR and LA-JEV showed no interference with antibody response and demonstrated good safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.