Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905410›Full record

Observational studyJCO oncology practice2022

Outcomes of Patients Placed in an Emergency Department Observation Unit of a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Patrick Chaftari, Demis N Lipe, Monica K Wattana, Aiham Qdaisat, Pavitra P Krishnamani, Jomol Thomas, Ahmed F Elsayem, Marcelo Sandoval

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrick ChaftariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-6712
Demis N LipeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2037-3085
Monica K WattanaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-4974
Aiham QdaisatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-8461
Pavitra P KrishnamaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-3589-1902
Jomol ThomasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ahmed F ElsayemDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Marcelo SandovalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-2461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency department observation units (EDOUs) have been shown to decrease length of stay and improve cost effectiveness. Yet, compared with noncancer patients, patients with cancer are placed in EDOUs less often. In this study, we aimed to describe patients who were placed in a cancer center's EDOU to discern their clinical characteristics and outcomes.

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study that included all patients age 18 years and older who presented to our emergency department (ED) and were placed in the EDOU between March 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020. The patients' electronic medical records were queried for demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis at the time of placement in the EDOU, length of stay, disposition from the EDOU, ED return within 72 hours after discharge from the EDOU, and mortality outcomes at 14 and 30 days.

resultsA total of 2,461 visits were eligible for analysis. Cancer-related pain was the main reason for observation in more than one quarter of the visits. The median length of stay in the EDOU was approximately 23 hours, and 69.6% of the patients were discharged. The ED return rate for unscheduled visits at 72 hours was 1.9%. The 14- and 30-day mortality rates were significantly higher for patients who were admitted than for those who were discharged (14 days: 1.7%

conclusionOur data suggest that placing patients with cancer in EDOUs is safe, reduces admissions, and reserves hospital resources for patients who can receive the most benefit without compromising care.

Indexed as

Clinical Observation UnitsNeoplasmsAdolescentEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansLength of StayRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34905410
PMCPMC9014449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.