ArticleCurrent microbiology2021
Comparative Study of Heavy Metal Uptake and Analysis of Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Multiple Heavy Metal-Resistant Bacteria Isolated From Arable Land.
Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated genomic and functional analysis of a Pb-resistant Pseudomonas mendocina L1 for phytoremediation of contaminated soils.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Isolation, characterization, identification, genomics and analyses of bioaccumulation and biosorption potential of two arsenic-resistant bacteria obtained from natural environments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Regulatory Element Analysis and Comparative Genomics Study of Heavy Metal-Resistant Genes in the Complete GenomeBioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Draft genome analysis forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metal-induced pollution is a serious environmental concern. This study was aimed at exploring indigenous heavy metal-resistant and plant growth promoting bacteria from arable land that might be useful for developing green strategies to counter the challenges related to bioremediation and sustainable agriculture. A thorough screening and characterization of all the twenty heavy metal-resistant bacterial isolates obtained in this study was done. Of these, three potent isolates were further analyzed to unravel their heavy metal resistance and uptake potentiality. Minimum inhibitory concentration determination depicted considerable tolerance (≥ 500 µg/mL) of the three isolates to Ni, Zn, Fe, Cd, Cu, etc. Growth kinetics of the isolates in presence of various heavy metals indicated differences between normal and metal-induced growth. pH tolerance and pigmentation ability of the isolates were also analyzed. Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry study revealed maximum Cd uptake by the isolates during exponential phase of growth. One of the isolates demonstrated plant growth promotion ability detected using different in vitro qualitative screening tests. Molecular identification using 16S rRNA depicted the isolates as strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This was the first study of heavy metal-resistant and plant growth promoting bacteria from this region. Further exploration of such multi metal-resistant indigenous bacteria may pave the way for designing effective strategies for bioremediation and sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.