Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905008›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2021

Global Percentage of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among the Tested Population and Individuals With Confirmed COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Qiuyue Ma, Jue Liu, Qiao Liu, Liangyu Kang, Runqing Liu, Wenzhan Jing, Yu Wu, Min Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
67.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 491 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-Term Consequences of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuyue MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jue LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qiao LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Liangyu KangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Runqing LiuSchool of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenzhan JingDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yu WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Asymptomatic infections are potential sources of transmission for COVID-19. Objective: To evaluate the percentage of asymptomatic infections among individuals undergoing testing (tested population) and those with confirmed COVID-19 (confirmed population). Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect were searched on February 4, 2021. Study Selection: Cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, case series studies, and case series on transmission reporting the number of asymptomatic infections among the tested and confirmed COVID-19 populations that were published in Chinese or English were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled percentage and its 95% CI. Three researchers performed the data extraction independently. Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of asymptomatic infections among the tested and confirmed populations. Results: Ninety-five unique eligible studies were included, covering 29 776 306 individuals undergoing testing. The pooled percentage of asymptomatic infections among the tested population was 0.25% (95% CI, 0.23%-0.27%), which was higher in nursing home residents or staff (4.52% [95% CI, 4.15%-4.89%]), air or cruise travelers (2.02% [95% CI, 1.66%-2.38%]), and pregnant women (2.34% [95% CI, 1.89%-2.78%]). The pooled percentage of asymptomatic infections among the confirmed population was 40.50% (95% CI, 33.50%-47.50%), which was higher in pregnant women (54.11% [95% CI, 39.16%-69.05%]), air or cruise travelers (52.91% [95% CI, 36.08%-69.73%]), and nursing home residents or staff (47.53% [95% CI, 36.36%-58.70%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis of the percentage of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among populations tested for and with confirmed COVID-19, the pooled percentage of asymptomatic infections was 0.25% among the tested population and 40.50% among the confirmed population. The high percentage of asymptomatic infections highlights the potential transmission risk of asymptomatic infections in communities.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAsymptomatic InfectionsChildCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34905008
PMCPMC8672238
OpenAlexW4200044874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.