Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34905005›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Gestational Age at Birth With Subsequent Suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder in Early Childhood in China.

Jing Hua, Anna L Barnett, Gareth J Williams, Xiaotian Dai, Yuanjie Sun, Haifeng Li, Guixia Chen, Lei Wang, Junyan Feng, Yingchun Liu and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Early-life NOThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Article
  5. Timing of Term Births and Associated Mortality Risks: Ecological Analysis Across 28 European Countries.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Recent research on the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing HuaShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Anna L BarnettCentre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gareth J WilliamsSchool of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Xiaotian DaiShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuanjie SunShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haifeng LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang, China.
Guixia ChenDepartment of Children Healthcare, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Fujian, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Child Health Care, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Yangzhou, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Yangzhou University, Jiangsu, China.
Junyan FengDepartment of Developmental Behaviour Pediatrics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Yingchun LiuMaternity Service Center of Changchun Maternal & Child Health Care Hospital, Jilin, China.
Lan ZhangChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan, China.
Ling ZhuMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Shanxi, Shanxi, China.
Tingting WengMaanshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Anhui Province, Anhui, China.
Hongyan GuanCapital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Yue GuSchool of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yingchun ZhouSchool of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Andrew ButcherDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Wenchong DuDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nottingham Trent University · GBShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CNEast China Normal University · CNCapital Institute of Pediatrics · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNJilin Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNJilin University · CNOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNXiamen University · CNYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It remains unknown whether children born at different degrees of prematurity, early term, and post term might have a higher risk of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) compared with completely full-term children (39-40 gestational weeks). Objective: To differentiate between suspected DCD in children with different gestational ages based on a national representative sample in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in China from April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. A total of 152 433 children aged 3 to 5 years from 2403 public kindergartens in 551 cities of China were included in the final analysis. A multilevel regression model was developed to determine the strength of association for different gestational ages associated with suspected DCD when considering kindergartens as clusters. Main Outcomes and Measures: Children's motor performance was assessed using the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire, completed by their parents. Gestational age was determined according to the mother's medical records and divided into 7 categories: completely full term (39 to 40 weeks' gestation), very preterm (<32 weeks), moderately preterm (32-33 weeks), late preterm (34-36 weeks), early term (37-38 weeks), late term (41 weeks), and post term (>41 weeks). Results: A total of 152 433 children aged 3 to 5 years (mean [SD] age, 4.5 [0.8] years), including 80 370 boys (52.7%) and 72 063 girls (47.3%), were included in the study. There were 45 052 children (29.6%) aged 3 years, 59 796 (39.2%) aged 4 years, and 47 585 (31.2%) aged 5 years. Children who were born very preterm (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.48), moderately preterm (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36), late preterm (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32), early term (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.16), and post term (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27) were more likely to be classified in the suspected DCD category on the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire than completely full-term children after adjusting for the same characteristics. Additionally, there was no association with suspected DCD in younger (aged 3 years) early-term and postterm children by stratified analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, every degree of prematurity at birth, early-term birth, and postterm birth were associated with suspected DCD when compared with full-term birth. These findings have important implications for understanding motor development in children born at different gestational ages. Long-term follow-up and rehabilitation interventions should be considered for children born early and post term.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolChinaCohort StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleMotor Skills DisordersRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34905005
PMCPMC8672235
OpenAlexW4200289753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.