Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904999›Full record

Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2021

Short-Term Parafoveal Cone Loss Despite Preserved Ellipsoid Zone in Rod Cone Dystrophy.

Danial Roshandel, Rachael C Heath Jeffery, Jason Charng, Danuta M Sampson, Samuel McLenachan, David A Mackey, Fred K Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Danial RoshandelCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rachael C Heath JefferyCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jason CharngCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Danuta M SampsonSurrey Biophotonics, Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing and School of Biosciences and Medicine, The University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Samuel McLenachanCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
David A MackeyCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Fred K ChenCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Lions Eye Institute · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) is characterized by centripetal loss of rod followed by cone photoreceptors. In this prospective, observational cohort, we used flood-illumination adaptive optics (AO) imaging to investigate parafoveal cone loss in regions with preserved ellipsoid zone (EZ) in patients with RCD. Methods: Eight patients with RCD and 10 age-matched healthy controls underwent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and AO imaging. The RCD cohort underwent a follow-up examination after 6 months. Cone density (CD) and intercone distance (ICD) measurements were performed at 2° temporal from the fovea. Baseline CD and ICD values were compared between the control and patient groups, and longitudinal changes were calculated in the patient group. Residual EZ span in patients was measured in horizontal foveal B-scans. Results: Between the control and patient groups, there was no significant difference in the baseline CD (2094 vs. 1750 cells/deg2, respectively; P = 0.09) and ICD (1.46 vs. 1.62 arcmin, respectively; P = 0.08). Mean CD declined by 198 cells/deg2 (-11.3%; P < 0.01), and mean ICD increased by 0.09 arcmin (+5.6%; P = 0.01) at the 6-month follow-up in the patient group. Mean baseline and follow-up residual EZ spans in the six patients with EZ defect were 3189 µm and 3065 µm, respectively (-3.9%; P = 0.08). Conclusions: AO imaging detected significant parafoveal cone loss over 6-month follow-up even in regions with preserved EZ. Further studies to refine AO imaging protocol and validate cone metrics as a structural endpoint in early RCD are warranted. Translational Relevance: CD and ICD may change prior to EZ span shortening in RCD.

Indexed as

Cone-Rod DystrophiesFovea CentralisHumansProspective StudiesRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID34904999
PMCPMC8684316
OpenAlexW4200228810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.