Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904726›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

Characterization of the diffusion signal of breast tissues using multi-exponential models.

Ana E Rodríguez-Soto, Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen, Lauren K Fang, Christopher C Conlin, Helen H Park, Grace S Ahn, Hauke Bartsch, Joshua Kuperman, Igor Vidić, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Multimodal apparent diffusion MRI model in noninvasive evaluation of breast cancer and Ki-67 expression.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted MRI Model.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ana E Rodríguez-SotoDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-547X
Maren M Sjaastad AndreassenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2581-7135
Lauren K FangDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-9276
Christopher C ConlinDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-8702
Helen H ParkSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1006-7028
Grace S AhnSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6141-589X
Hauke BartschDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-4128
Joshua KupermanDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-4785
Igor VidićDepartment of Physics, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6610-1187
Haydee Ojeda-FournierDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-0050
Anne M WallaceDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-2491
Michael HahnDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8323-8174
Tyler M SeibertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-7399
Neil Peter JeromeDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-5930
Agnes ØstlieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Tone Frost BathenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-6965
Pål Erik GoaDepartment of Physics, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6866-6111
Rebecca Rakow-PennerDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2566-1978
Anders M DaleDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6126-2966

Funding

Improving assessment of prostate cancer bone metastases using advanced diffusion imagingK08EB026503 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEIBERT, TYLER MICHAEL · 2019 to 2022
$805k
NIBIB NIH HHS K08 EB026503NIBIB NIH HHS K08EB026503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRestriction spectrum imaging (RSI) decomposes the diffusion-weighted MRI signal into separate components of known apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). The number of diffusion components and optimal ADCs for RSI are organ-specific and determined empirically. The purpose of this work was to determine the RSI model for breast tissues.

methodsThe diffusion-weighted MRI signal was described using a linear combination of multiple exponential components. A set of ADC values was estimated to fit voxels in cancer and control ROIs. Later, the signal contributions of each diffusion component were estimated using these fixed ADC values. Relative-fitting residuals and Bayesian information criterion were assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratio between cancer and fibroglandular tissue in RSI-derived signal contribution maps was compared to DCE imaging.

resultsA total of 74 women with breast cancer were scanned at 3.0 Tesla MRI. The fitting residuals of conventional ADC and Bayesian information criterion suggest that a 3-component model improves the characterization of the diffusion signal over a biexponential model. Estimated ADCs of triexponential model were D

conclusionBreast diffusion-weighted MRI signal was best described using a triexponential model. Tumor conspicuity in breast RSI model is comparable to that of DCE without the use of exogenous contrast. These data may be used as differential features between healthy and malignant breast tissues.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingBayes TheoremBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Mediabreast MRIDWIDW-MRIrestriction spectrum imagingRSI

Identifiers

PMID34904726
PMCPMC9148547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.