Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904539›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2021

Tailoring youth-friendly health services in Nigeria: a mixed-methods analysis of a designathon approach.

Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Kadija M Tahlil, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Titilola Gbaja-Biamila, Sarah E Asuquo, Ifeoma Idigbe, Rhonda BeLue, David Oladele, Kathryn E Muessig, Nora E Rosenberg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. User-centered adaption ofAIDS care · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ucheoma NwaozuruCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint, Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0680-0928
Kadija M TahlilDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint, Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-9313
Titilola Gbaja-BiamilaNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Sarah E AsuquoDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ifeoma IdigbeNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Rhonda BeLueCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint, Louis, MO, USA.
David OladeleCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint, Louis, MO, USA.
Kathryn E MuessigDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nora E RosenbergDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jason J OngCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Adesola Z MusaNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Weiming TangDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-707X
Oliver EzechiNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Juliet IwelunmorCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint, Louis, MO, USA.
Joseph D TuckerLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

HIV Intervention Science Training Program for Underserved Investigators R25MH080665 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI EL-BASSEL, NABILA, WU, ELWIN · 2007 to 2023
$2.8M
ITEST: Innovative Tools to Expand Youth-Friendly HIV Self-TestingUG3HD096929 · NICHD · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI EZECHI, OLIVER CHUKWUJEKWU, IWELUNMOR, JULIET · 2018 to 2019
$2.3M
Mentoring Multidisciplinary Global HIV Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AI143471 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph David Tucker · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
Acceptability and Feasibility of Unsupervised HIV Self-Testing Among Networks of Men in TanzaniaR00MH110343 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CONSERVE, DONALDSON · 2018 to 2020
$765k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143471NICHD NIH HHS UG3 HD096929NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH110343NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people in low- and middle-income countries are often neglected in designing youth-friendly health services, especially HIV testing and preventive services. Designathons, which are time-bounded co-creation events where individuals gather in teams to develop solutions to a problem, could promote youth participation and ownership of health services.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine youth participation in a designathon to create youth-friendly health services in Nigeria.

methodsOur designathon was based on crowdsourcing principles and informed by a human-centered design approach. The designathon included an open call for Nigerian youths between 14 and 24 years to share ideas on how to promote uptake of HIV self-testing services and a three-day sprint event that brought together diverse teams to develop strategies enhancing linkage to care. Teams pitched their solutions to a panel of five independent experts who scored ideas based on the desirability, feasibility, potential impact, and teamwork. We used descriptive statistics to summarize participants' demographics and conducted a content analysis to synthesize themes from youth proposals.

resultsNine hundred seventy-six youth across Nigeria applied to join the designathon. Forty-eight youth in 13 teams participated in the designathon with a median age of 20 years (IQR: 17-22]. Boys and young men were 48.5% (446/919) of the total applicants, 62.5% (30/48) of the designathon participants, and 63.6% (7/11) of the finalists. Students, from all educational levels, represented 91.2% (841/922) of the total applicants, 88.4% (38/43) of the designathon participants, and 90.0% (9/10) of the finalists. About twenty-three percent (3/13) of the final proposals were top ranked. The three finalist approaches to optimize youth-friendly health services centered on decentralizing service delivery to young people through mobile health technologies, use of mobile tents, or peer support services.

conclusionsOur open call engaged diverse groups of Nigerian youth, including young women and students. Our data suggest that designathons may be useful for developing tailored youth-friendly health services. Further research is needed to understand the designathon process and the effectiveness of the finalist submissions.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningTelemedicineAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34904539
PMCPMC8676684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.