ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Percutaneous Robot-Assisted versus Freehand S
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-assisted percutaneous pelvic channel screw placement for unstable pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative technical comparison of multi-platform differences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- How Can Technology Improve Acetabular and Pelvic Fractures Management in the Operating Room? A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive clinical outcomes of TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for pelvic fractures: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of robotic surgery on reducing radiation exposure in orthopedic trauma: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy in navigated percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction for pelvic fractures: a clinical study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Delayed reduction of tile C pelvic ring injuries and evidence-based management strategies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Article
- Robotic-assisted navigation with patient-specific implants vs. modified Stoppa and MIPPO in Tile C pelvic fractures: a multicenter cross-sectional observational study with osteoporosis subgroup analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
- The Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with TiRobot-assisted percutaneous anterior column screw fixation for transverse with or without posterior wall fractures of acetabulum: a retrospective study.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Efficacy analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- [Effectiveness analysis of 5G remote robotic surgery in pelvic fracture treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- TiRobot ForcePro Superior combined with suture-button plates for minimally invasive treatment of an acetabular both-column fracture - a case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Freehand Placement of a Transiliac-Transsacral Screw for Fixation of Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy analysis of minimally invasive treatment for scapular coracoid fractures assisted by TiRobot ForcePro Superior.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- Article
- TiRobot-Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Elderly Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the efficiency, safety, and accuracy of S
methodsThis is a retrospective clinical study. We analyzed the patients treated with S
resultsA total of 89 IS screws were implanted into S2 iliosacral joint. Fifty-four screws were placed by RA (38 patients) and 35 screws were by FH (25 patients). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographic data. There was no screw-related complications or revision surgery in any group. In terms of screw placement, the excellent and good rate was 100% in the RA group, better than that in the FH group where it was only 85.7% (P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was 8.06 ± 3.54 s in RA group, which was much less than that in the FH group (27.37 ± 8.82 s, P < 0.001). The guide wire attempts in the RA group (0.685 ± 0.820) were much less than those in the FH group (5.77 ± 3.34) (P < 0.001). Both the fluoroscopy time per screw and the number of guide wire attempts in the RA group were much less than those in the FH group (P < 0.001). The overall postoperative excellent and good rate of Matta standard in RA and FH groups were 86.8% (34/4) and 90.0% (23/25), respectively (P = 0.750), and there was no statistical difference.
conclusionThe robot-assisted surgery is an accurate and minimally invasive technique. S
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.