Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904313›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2022

Lockdown and licensed premises: COVID-19 lessons for alcohol policy.

Niamh Fitzgerald, Francesco Manca, Isabelle Uny, Jack Gregor Martin, Rachel O'Donnell, Allison Ford, Amelie Begley, Martine Stead, Jim Lewsey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niamh FitzgeraldInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-8165
Francesco MancaInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-6774
Isabelle UnyInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-5332
Jack Gregor MartinInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Rachel O'DonnellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-1847
Allison FordInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3624-6673
Amelie BegleyInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Martine SteadInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-4604
Jim LewseyInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3811-8165
University of Stirling · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office COV/STG/20/15Chief Scientist Office HIPS/18/57Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme 15/129/11Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office HIPS 18/57Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office STG/20/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated unprecedented changes in alcohol availability, including closures, curfews and restrictions. We draw on new data from three UK studies exploring these issues to identify implications for premises licensing and wider policy.

methods(i) Semi-structured interviews (n = 17) with licensing stakeholders in Scotland and England reporting how COVID-19 has reshaped local licensing and alcohol-related harms; (ii) semi-structured interviews (n = 15) with ambulance clinicians reporting experiences with alcohol during the pandemic; and (iii) descriptive and time series analyses of alcohol-related ambulance callouts in Scotland before and during the first UK lockdown (1 January 2019 to 30 June 2020).

resultsCOVID-19 restrictions (closures, curfews) affected on-trade premises only and licensing stakeholders highlighted the relaxation of some laws (e.g. on takeaway alcohol) and a rise in home drinking as having long-term risks for public health. Ambulance clinicians described a welcome break from pre-pandemic mass public intoxication and huge reductions in alcohol-related callouts at night-time. They also highlighted potential long-term risks of increased home drinking. The national lockdown was associated with an absolute fall of 2.14 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.54, -0.74; P = 0.003] in alcohol-related callouts as a percentage of total callouts, followed by a daily increase of +0.03% (95% CI 0.010, 0.05; P = 0.004). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsCOVID-19 gave rise to both restrictions on premises and relaxations of licensing, with initial reductions in alcohol-related ambulance callouts, a rise in home drinking and diverse impacts on businesses. Policies which may protect on-trade businesses, while reshaping the night-time economy away from alcohol-related harms, could offer a 'win-win' for policymakers and health advocates.

Indexed as

COVID-19Alcohol DrinkingCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPublic Policyalcohol availabilityalcohol policyambulanceCOVID-19licensing

Identifiers

PMID34904313
PMCPMC9300075
OpenAlexW4200059360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.