Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904209›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Comparison of Net Clinical Benefit Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients in China With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Dandan Li, Yang Sun, Xiaoran Ye, Lanting Li, Yundai Chen, Daowen Wang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan Li *Senior Departentment of Cardiology, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yang Sun *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoran YeShanghai Palan DataRx Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Lanting LiShanghai Palan DataRx Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yundai ChenSenior Departentment of Cardiology, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. cyundai@vip.163.com.
Daowen WangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. dwwang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the difference in net clinical benefit of clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin after 12 months in patients in mainland China with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs).

methodsIn this multicenter, retrospective, real-world study, the data were sourced from three databases: BRIC-ACS(I) study, COSTIC study, and 301 Hospital PCI patient database from January 2014 to October 2017. The primary endpoint of the study was net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE) comprised of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥ 2 (excluding BARC type = 4) bleeding, whereas the secondary end point was evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding events.

resultsA total of 7862 ACS patients were included in the final analysis, of whom propensity score matching (PSM) analysis yielded 2165 patients in each cohort. After PSM analysis, cumulative incidence of NACCE was significantly lower with clopidogrel and aspirin than with ticagrelor and aspirin [117 (5.4%) vs. 180 (8.3%), P < 0.001] at 12 months. Effect estimates showed reduced risk of NACCE occurrence in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77, P < 0.001]. Incidence of bleeding was significantly lower in the clopidogrel cohort than in the ticagrelor cohort (aHR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.66, P < 0.001). Clopidogrel and aspirin therapy was comparable to ticagrelor and aspirin in reducing the incidence of MACE after PSM analysis.

conclusionIn Chinese ACS patients who underwent PCI with second-generation DESs, outpatient use of clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduction in NACCE and bleeding.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionChinaClopidogrelHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesTicagrelorTreatment OutcomeClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorAspirinClopidogrelDrug eluting stentsDual antiplatelet therapyNACCEticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID34904209
OpenAlexW4200462812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.