ArticlePharmaceutical research2021
Clofazimine-Loaded Mucoadhesive Nanoparticles Prepared by Flash Nanoprecipitation for Strategic Intestinal Delivery.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study was undertaken to develop novel mucoadhesive formulations of clofazimine (CFZ), a drug candidate for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis, with the aim of strategic delivery to the small intestine, the main site of the disease parasites.
methodsCFZ-loaded nanoparticles (nCFZ) coated with non-biodegradable anionic polymer (nCFZ/A) and biodegradable anionic protein complex (nCFZ/dA) were prepared by Flash NanoPrecipitation (FNP) and evaluated for their physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties.
resultsThe mean diameters of nCFZ/A and nCFZ/dA were ca. 90 and 240 nm, respectively, and they showed narrow size distributions and negative ζ-potentials. Both formulations showed higher solubility of CFZ in aqueous solution than crystalline CFZ. Despite their improved dispersion behaviors, both formulations exhibited significantly lower diffusiveness than crystalline CFZ in a diffusion test using artificial mucus (AM). Quartz crystal microbalance analysis showed that both formulations clearly interacted with mucin, which appeared to be responsible for their reduced diffusiveness in AM. These results suggest the potent mucoadhesion of nCFZ/A and nCFZ/dA. After the oral administration of CFZ samples (10 mg-CFZ/kg) to rats, nCFZ/dA and nCFZ/A exhibited a prolongation in T
conclusionThe use of FNP may produce mucoadhesive CFZ formulations with improved intestinal exposure, possibly offering enhanced anti-cryptosporidium therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.