ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2021
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an
Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06254053 (Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative Material Versus a Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative Material Versus a Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer restorations in molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Clinical Assessment of a Newer Resin-based Bioactive Restorative Cement on Class II Cavities of Primary Molars: A Comparative Analysis.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Study of Esthetic Outcome of Pedo Shades of Composite Resin-A Randomized Controlled Trial:International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Time-Dependent Adhesion and Fluoride Release of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements on Demineralized Enamel, Sound Enamel and Dentine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of bond durability of different self-adhesive bioactive restorative systems to dentin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of the Different Dietary Supplements on the Average Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Direct Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Zirconia-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement's Effectiveness in Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2023Review
- Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three different glass ionomer cement (conventional, zirconium-reinforced and advanced glass hybrid) in primary molars: an in vitro study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023Article
- Microshear Bond Strength of Bioactive Materials to Dentin and Resin Composite.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Update on Dental Luting Materials.Dentistry journal · 2022Review
- Clinical Performance of Zirconia Reinforced versus Conventional Viscous Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of Geriatric Patients: A 1-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
statement of the problemThe success of dental restorations depends mainly on its ability to bond to dental structures and resist the multitude of forces acting on it within the oral cavity. PURPOSE: Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different glass ionomer based restorative materials. MATERIALS AND
methodIn this
resultsThe SBS values were significantly greater in the ACTIVA KIDS group as compared to the other two groups (
conclusionThe SBS of the ACTIVA KIDS to primary teeth dentin was the highest as compared to Zirconomer and conventional GIC. Therefore ACTIVA KIDS may protect primary teeth against recurrent caries and failure of the restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.