Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903947›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

First report of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 detection in two asymptomatic cats in the state of Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil.

Ivyson da Silva Epifanio, Davi Dos Santos Rodrigues, Leonardo Borges de Lima, Maria Aurea de Azevedo Nogueira, Laelia Reginae do Monte Pessoa Felix, Barbara Ferreira de Almeida, Claudia Kathariny da Silva Farias, Otavio Valerio de Carvalho, Rita de Cassia Carvalho Maia, Luiz Eduardo Ristow and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivyson da Silva EpifanioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Davi Dos Santos RodriguesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Leonardo Borges de LimaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maria Aurea de Azevedo NogueiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Laelia Reginae do Monte Pessoa FelixDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Barbara Ferreira de AlmeidaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Claudia Kathariny da Silva FariasDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Otavio Valerio de CarvalhoTECSA Animal Reference Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rita de Cassia Carvalho MaiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Luiz Eduardo RistowTECSA Animal Reference Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
David Soeiro BarbosaDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Juliana Arena GalhardoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Christina Pettan-BrewerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Louise Bach KmetiukDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paran, Curitiba, Paran, Brazil.
Rafael Garabet AgopianDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Santo Amaro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valeria DutraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiab, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Helio Autran de MoraisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Andrea Pires Dos SantosDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Alexander Welker BiondoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paran, Curitiba, Paran, Brazil.
Daniel Friguglietti BrandespimDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRBrazilian College of Animal Reproduction · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso · BROregon State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversidade de Santo Amaro · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimDespite worldwide case reports, including Brazilian cases, no frequency study on infection of pets by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been conducted to date in Brazil. Accordingly, the present study was aimed to assess dogs and cats belonging to positive owners in Recife, Northeastern Brazil. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a longitudinal prospective study on dogs and cats in the city of Recife whose owners were in isolation at home due to a confirmed laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 through reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Oral and rectal swabs from the pets were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific RNA by means of RT-qPCR.

resultsAmong the pets tested, 0/16 dogs and 2/15 cats were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, the two positive cats were owned by two unrelated asymptomatic veterinary students, which, therefore, post a warning to veterinarians worldwide.

conclusionThe findings herein indicate that cats may act as sentinels for human cases, particularly sharing households with asymptomatic human cases. Although with small sampling and convenient recruiting, the presence of infected cats by SARS-CoV-2 was most likely due to close cat-human contact with positive owners, posting a human-animal health threat when pets share the same bed and interact with owners without protection, particularly during owner self-isolation. Thus, infected owners should follow the same human preventive guidelines with their pets to avoid spreading infection.

Indexed as

Brazilcoronavirusdomestic animalspandemic

Identifiers

PMID34903947
PMCPMC8654769
OpenAlexW3209523308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.