Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903943›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

Investigation of

Arunima Oarin Tresha, Mohammad Arif, Sk Shaheenur Islam, A K M Ziaul Haque, Md Tanvir Rahman, S M Lutful Kabir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arunima Oarin TreshaDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Mohammad ArifDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Sk Shaheenur IslamDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
A K M Ziaul HaqueDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Md Tanvir RahmanDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
S M Lutful KabirDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh Agricultural University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimNecrotic enteritis (NE) is one of the most prevalent diseases in broiler poultry caused by MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 40 small-scale commercial broiler farms randomly selected from two subdistricts of Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. As an individual sample, 240 cloacal swabs, and as a pooled sample, 40 drinking water, 40 workers' hand washing, 40 litter swab, and 40 feed samples were collected and evaluated by culture, biochemical, and molecular assays. A pretested semi-structured interview questionnaire was employed to capture flock-level data on risk factors from the farm owners. The flock-level data on risk factors were assessed through univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses with p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsOverall flock-level prevalence of

conclusionEvidence-based control options need to be taken through the uses of prebiotics and probiotics, biosecurity, and hygienic measurement, including control of coccidia infection, is needed to lessen the NE infection and AMR related to this pathogen in small-scale commercial broiler poultry.

Indexed as

antimicrobial-resistantBangladeshbroilerClostridium perfringensnecrotic enteritisprevalence

Identifiers

PMID34903943
PMCPMC8654751
OpenAlexW3210259624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.