Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903818›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Determination of biomarkers from microarray data using graph neural network and spectral clustering.

Kun Yu, Weidong Xie, Linjie Wang, Shoujia Zhang, Wei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Application of Graph Neural Networks to Extract Candidate Genes and Biological Associations.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kun Yu *College of Medicine and Bioinformation Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Weidong Xie *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Linjie WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Shoujia ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Wei LiKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing in Medical Image MIIC, Northeastern University, Ministry of Education, Shenyang, China. liwei@cse.neu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bioinformatics, the rapid development of gene sequencing technology has produced an increasing amount of microarray data. This type of data shares the typical characteristics of small sample size and high feature dimensions. Searching for biomarkers from microarray data, which expression features of various diseases, is essential for the disease classification. feature selection has therefore became fundemental for the analysis of microarray data, which designs to remove irrelevant and redundant features. There are a large number of redundant features and irrelevant features in microarray data, which severely degrade the classification effectiveness. We propose an innovative feature selection method with the goal of obtaining feature dependencies from a priori knowledge and removing redundant features using spectral clustering. In this paper, the graph structure is firstly constructed by using the gene interaction network as a priori knowledge, and then a link prediction method based on graph neural network is proposed to enhance the graph structure data. Finally, a feature selection method based on spectral clustering is proposed to determine biomarkers. The classification accuracy on DLBCL and Prostate can be improved by 10.90% and 16.22% compared to traditional methods. Link prediction provides an average classification accuracy improvement of 1.96% and 1.31%, and is up to 16.98% higher than the published method. The results show that the proposed method can have full use of a priori knowledge to effectively select disease prediction biomarkers with high classification accuracy.

Identifiers

PMID34903818
PMCPMC8668890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.