Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903779›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

The long term participation trend for the colorectal cancer screening after the 2011 triple disaster in Minamisoma City, Fukushima, Japan.

Hiroaki Saito, Akihiko Ozaki, Michio Murakami, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Toyoaki Sawano, Sho Fujioka, Yuki Shimada, Tianchen Zhao, Tomoyoshi Oikawa, Yukio Kanazawa and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging trends in the global burden of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiroaki SaitoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan. h.saito0515@gmail.com.
Akihiko OzakiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.
Michio MurakamiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshitaka NishikawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan.
Toyoaki SawanoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.
Sho FujiokaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan.
Yuki ShimadaResearch Center for Community Health, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan.
Tianchen ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.
Tomoyoshi OikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan.
Yukio KanazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan.
Masaharu TsubokuraDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a well-established cancer screening method, and its effectiveness depends on maintaining a high participation rate in the target population. In this study, we analyzed the trends in CRC screening participation rates over 10 years in Minamisoma City, where residents were forced to evacuate after the 2011 triple disaster in Fukushima, Japan. The immunochemical fecal occult blood test is provided as municipal CRC screening. We calculated the annual CRC screening participation rate and analyzed the factors associated with participation in screening. Overall, 4069 (12.3%) and 3839 (11.7%) persons participated in CRC screening in 2009 and 2010, respectively; however, the number decreased significantly to 1090 (3.4%) in 2011 when the earthquake occurred. Over the following 3 years, the rate gradually recovered. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that age < 65 years, living alone, and evacuation were significant associated factors for non-participation after 2011 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the CRC screening participation rate decreased significantly during the Great East Japan Earthquake but recovered over the next 3 years. Further analysis of factors preventing CRC screening participation and research on the long-term effects of its post-disaster decline are important to consider in assessing the need for intervention in post-disaster cancer screening.

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient ParticipationSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID34903779
PMCPMC8668878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.