Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903761›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Exploring the legacy of Central European historical winter wheat landraces.

András Cseh, Péter Poczai, Tibor Kiss, Krisztina Balla, Zita Berki, Ádám Horváth, Csaba Kuti, Ildikó Karsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

András Cseh *Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary. cseh.andras@atk.hu.
Péter Poczai *Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Tibor KissAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Krisztina BallaAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Zita BerkiAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Ádám HorváthAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Csaba KutiAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Ildikó KarsaiAgricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical wheat landraces are rich sources of genetic diversity offering untapped reservoirs for broadening the genetic base of modern varieties. Using a 20K SNP array, we investigated the accessible genetic diversity in a Central European bread wheat landrace collection with great drought, heat stress tolerance and higher tillering capacity. We discovered distinct differences in the number of average polymorphisms between landraces and modern wheat cultivars, and identified a set of novel rare alleles present at low frequencies in the landrace collection. The detected polymorphisms were unevenly distributed along the wheat genome, and polymorphic markers co-localized with genes of great agronomic importance. The geographical distribution of the inferred Bayesian clustering revealed six genetically homogenous ancestral groups among the collection, where the Central European core bared an admixed background originating from four ancestral groups. We evaluated the effective population sizes (Ne) of the Central European collection and assessed changes in diversity over time, which revealed a dramatic ~ 97% genetic erosion between 1955 and 2015.

Identifiers

PMID34903761
PMCPMC8668957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.