Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903744›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Comparison of potential drinking water source contamination across one hundred U.S. cities.

Sean W D Turner, Jennie S Rice, Kristian D Nelson, Chris R Vernon, Ryan McManamay, Kerim Dickson, Landon Marston

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biodiversity in Urban Green Space: A Bibliometric Review on the Current Research Field and Its Prospects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Urban groundwater supplies facing dual pressures of depletion and contamination in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ag-Incorporated Cr-Doped BaTiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Automated Drone-Delivery Solar-Driven Onsite Wastewater Smart Monitoring and Treatment System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean W D TurnerPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. sean.turner@pnnl.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-9800
Jennie S RicePacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7833-9456
Kristian D NelsonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Chris R VernonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-6214
Ryan McManamayBaylor University, Waco, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5551-3140
Kerim DicksonKansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-3133
Landon MarstonVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drinking water supplies of cities are exposed to potential contamination arising from land use and other anthropogenic activities in local and distal source watersheds. Because water quality sampling surveys are often piecemeal, regionally inconsistent, and incomplete with respect to unregulated contaminants, the United States lacks a detailed comparison of potential source water contamination across all of its large cities. Here we combine national-scale geospatial datasets with hydrologic simulations to compute two metrics representing potential contamination of water supplies from point and nonpoint sources for over a hundred U.S. cities. We reveal enormous diversity in anthropogenic activities across watersheds with corresponding disparities in the potential contamination of drinking water supplies to cities. Approximately 5% of large cities rely on water that is composed primarily of runoff from non-pristine lands (e.g., agriculture, residential, industrial), while four-fifths of all large cities that withdraw surface water are exposed to treated wastewater in their supplies.

Indexed as

Water SupplyAnthropogenic EffectsCitiesDrinking WaterEnvironmental MonitoringHumansHydrologyModels, TheoreticalUnited StatesWastewaterWater PollutionWater PurificationWater QualityDrinking WaterWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34903744
PMCPMC8669013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.