Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903724›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Natural Language Processing markers in first episode psychosis and people at clinical high-risk.

Sarah E Morgan, Kelly Diederen, Petra E Vértes, Samantha H Y Ip, Bo Wang, Bethany Thompson, Arsime Demjaha, Andrea De Micheli, Dominic Oliver, Maria Liakata and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06978803 (HYEEG Discourse in Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06978803 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

HYEEG Discourse in Psychosis: A Neurobehavioural Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDouglas Mental Health University InstituteRan2024 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsPsychosis, Schizophrenia Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural neuroimaging correlates of semantic incoherence in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah E MorganDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK. sem91@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1261-5884
Kelly DiederenDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Petra E VértesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Samantha H Y IpDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
Bo WangThe Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-3768
Bethany ThompsonDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Arsime DemjahaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Andrea De MicheliEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Dominic OliverEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-3407
Maria LiakataThe Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK.
Paolo Fusar-PoliEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3582-6788
Tom J Spencer *Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Philip McGuire *Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
King's College London · GBTuring Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that disorganised speech might be a powerful predictor of later psychotic illness in clinical high risk subjects. To that end, several automated measures to quantify disorganisation of transcribed speech have been proposed. However, it remains unclear which measures are most strongly associated with psychosis, how different measures are related to each other and what the best strategies are to collect speech data from participants. Here, we assessed whether twelve automated Natural Language Processing markers could differentiate transcribed speech excerpts from subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis, first episode psychosis patients and healthy control subjects (total N = 54). In-line with previous work, several measures showed significant differences between groups, including semantic coherence, speech graph connectivity and a measure of whether speech was on-topic, the latter of which outperformed the related measure of tangentiality. Most NLP measures examined were only weakly related to each other, suggesting they provide complementary information. Finally, we compared the ability of transcribed speech generated using different tasks to differentiate the groups. Speech generated from picture descriptions of the Thematic Apperception Test and a story re-telling task outperformed free speech, suggesting that choice of speech generation method may be an important consideration. Overall, quantitative speech markers represent a promising direction for future clinical applications.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPsychotic DisordersBiomarkersCognitionHumansSpeechBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34903724
PMCPMC8669009
OpenAlexW3208539668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.