Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903538›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Chlorhexidine oral rinses for symptomatic COPD: a randomised, blind, placebo-controlled preliminary study.

Alexa A Pragman, Ann M Fieberg, Cavan S Reilly, Christine Wendt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02252588 (The Effect of Chlorhexidine on the Oral and Lung Microbiota in Chronic Obstructive), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02252588 phase2completednot on this map

The Effect of Chlorhexidine on the Oral and Lung Microbiota in Chronic Obstructive

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2014 to 2020Enrolled44ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsChlorhexidine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Inhibitory effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Microbiome in COPD: Emerging Potential for Microbiome-Targeted Interventions.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexa A PragmanDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8152-3951
Ann M FiebergCoordinating Center for Biometric Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Cavan S ReillyDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Christine WendtDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA wendt005@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-8745
Minneapolis VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
Evaluation of the Oral and Lung Microbiota and Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Frequent ExacerbatorsIK2CX001095 · VA · MINNEAPOLIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PRAGMAN, ALEXA A · 2016 to 2021
–
CSRD VA I01 CX002130CSRD VA IK2 CX001095NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermine the effect of twice-daily chlorhexidine oral rinses on oral and lung microbiota biomass and respiratory symptoms.

settingSingle centre.

participantsParticipants were aged 40-85 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic productive cough or COPD exacerbation within the last year. Exclusions included antibiotics in the previous 2 months and/or those with less than four teeth. Forty-four participants were recruited and 40 completed the study.

interventionParticipants were randomised 1:1 to twice-daily 0.12% chlorhexidine oral rinses versus placebo for 2 months along with daily diaries. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), blood tests, oral rinse and induced sputum were collected at randomisation and the final visit. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was a change in oral and sputum microbiota biomass. Secondary outcomes included: sputum and oral microbiota Shannon and Simpson diversity and taxonomy; inflammatory markers; Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale and SGRQ scores.

resultsNeither the oral microbiota nor the sputum microbiota biomass decreased significantly in those using chlorhexidine compared with placebo (oral microbiota mean log

conclusionsWe did not detect a significant difference in microbiota biomass due to chlorhexidine use. Chlorhexidine decreased oral and sputum microbiota alpha diversity and improved respiratory health-related quality of life compared with placebo.

trial registrationNCT02252588.

Indexed as

ChlorhexidinePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDyspneaHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSputumChlorhexidinechronic airways diseasemicrobiologyrespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID34903538
PMCPMC8672026
OpenAlexW4200309462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.