Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903517›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Identifying opportunities for timely diagnosis of bladder and renal cancer via abnormal blood tests: a longitudinal linked data study.

Yin Zhou, Fiona M Walter, Luke Mounce, Gary A Abel, Hardeep Singh, Willie Hamilton, Grant D Stewart, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04166240 (Measuring and Improving the Safety of Test Result Follow-Up), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04166240 nacompletednot on this map

Measuring and Improving the Safety of Test Result Follow-Up

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2018 to 2023Enrolled46ConditionsLung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer, Bladder CancerArmsSAFER TRACKS Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prediagnostic prescription patterns in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective primary care cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yin ZhouPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fiona M WalterPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; professor of primary care cancer research, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Luke MounceUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Gary A AbelUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, US; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US.
Willie HamiltonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Grant D StewartDepartment of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Georgios LyratzopoulosEpidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18180Cancer Research UK C8640/A2338Cancer Research UK C9685/A25177Wellcome Trust 203921/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding pre-diagnostic test use could reveal diagnostic windows where more timely evaluation for cancer may be indicated.

aimTo examine pre-diagnostic patterns of results of abnormal blood tests in patients with bladder and renal cancer. DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective cohort study using primary care and cancer registry data on patients with bladder and renal cancer who were diagnosed between April 2012 and December 2015 in England.

methodThe rates of patients with a first abnormal result in the year before cancer diagnosis, for 'generic' (full blood count components, inflammatory markers, and calcium) and 'organ-specific' blood tests (creatinine and liver function test components) that may lead to subsequent detection of incidental cancers, were examined. Poisson regression was used to detect the month during which the cohort's rate of each abnormal test started to increase from baseline. The proportion of patients with a test found in the first half of the diagnostic window was examined, as these 'early' tests might represent opportunities where further evaluation could be initiated.

resultsData from 4533 patients with bladder and renal cancer were analysed. The monthly rate of patients with a first abnormal test increased towards the time of cancer diagnosis. Abnormalities of both generic (for example, high inflammatory markers) and organ-specific tests (for example, high creatinine) started to increase from 6-8 months pre-diagnosis, with 25%-40% of these patients having an abnormal test in the 'early half' of the diagnostic window.

conclusionPopulation-level signals of bladder and renal cancer can be observed in abnormalities in commonly performed primary care blood tests up to 8 months before diagnosis, indicating the potential for earlier diagnosis in some patients.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsUrinary BladderHumansLongitudinal StudiesRetrospective StudiesSemantic Webbladder cancerdiagnostic tests, routineearly detection of cancerprimary health carerenal cancertest utilisation

Identifiers

PMID34903517
PMCPMC8714503
OpenAlexW3205856451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.