Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903373›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Public health spending, primary care, and perceived risk promoted vaccination against H1N1.

Anna R Zhao, David M Bishai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cross fertilisation of Public Health and Translational Research.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna R ZhaoJohns Hopkins University, 3505 N. Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States. Electronic address: azhao13@jhu.edu.
David M BishaiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 120 South Hays Rd.m, Baltimore, MD 21014, United States. Electronic address: dbishai1@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine factors affecting the intent to vaccinate during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and to leverage the results to inform public health policy decisions aimed at increasing vaccine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the National 2009 H1N1 Flu Survey data and state-level administrative data, we employ logistic regression and mediation models to estimate the association between vaccine uptake and state level public health spending, political ideology, and H1N1 case and death rates as well as a set of individual and household characteristics. We find that higher public health spending can significantly increase the intent to vaccinate, mainly through raising concerns about the pandemic and promoting vaccine relevant doctor patient interactions. We conclude that physicians, especially primary care physicians, should play more important roles in the ongoing vaccination efforts against the COVID-19 virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CarePublic HealthSARS-CoV-2VaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 pandemicH1N1 flu surveyH1N1 pandemicHealth policyLogistic regressionPandemicPhysiciansPrimary carePublic healthVaccinateVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34903373
PMCPMC8664079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.