Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903303›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2021

Development and validation of ester impregnated pH strips for locating nasogastric feeding tubes in the stomach-a multicentre prospective diagnostic performance study.

Melody Ni, Mina E Adam, Fatima Akbar, Jeremy R Huddy, Simone Borsci, Peter Buckle, Francesca Rubulotta, Reuben Carr, Ian Fotheringham, Claire Wilson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and accuracy of the transillumination-guided gastric tube placement in neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Melody NiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-848X
Mina E AdamDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Fatima AkbarDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Jeremy R HuddyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Simone BorsciDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Peter BuckleDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Francesca RubulottaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Reuben CarrIngenza Ltd., Roslin, UK.
Ian FotheringhamIngenza Ltd., Roslin, UK.
Claire WilsonIngenza Ltd., Roslin, UK.
Matthew TsangIngenza Ltd., Roslin, UK.
Susan HardingThe Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
Nichola WhiteMedway Maritime NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, UK.
George B HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK. g.hanna@imperial.ac.uk.
St Mary's Hospital · GBIngenza (United Kingdom) · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBMedway NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Innovate UK BMC late stage awardMedical Research Council MC_PC_15008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNG (nasogastric) tubes are used worldwide as a means to provide enteral nutrition. Testing the pH of tube aspirates prior to feeding is commonly used to verify tube location before feeding or medication. A pH at or lower than 5.5 was taken as evidence for stomach intubation. However, the existing standard pH strips lack sensitivity, especially in patients receiving feeding and antacids medication. We developed and validated a first-generation ester-impregnated pH strip test to improve the accuracy towards gastric placements in adult population receiving routine NG-tube feeding. The sensitivity was improved by its augmentation with the action of human gastric lipase (HGL), an enzyme specific to the stomach.

methodsWe carried out a multi-centred, prospective, two-gate diagnostic accuracy study on patients who require routine NG-tube feeding in 10 NHS hospitals comparing the sensitivity of the novel pH strip to the standard pH test, using either chest X-rays or, in its absence, clinical observation of the absence of adverse events as the reference standard. We also tested the novel pH strips in lung aspirates from patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgeries using visual inspection as the reference standard. We simulated health economics using a decision analytic model and carried out adoption studies to understand its route to commercialisation. The primary end point is the sensitivity of novel and standard pH tests at the recommended pH cut-off of 5.5.

resultsA total of 6400 ester-impregnated pH strips were prepared based on an ISO13485 quality management system. A total of 376 gastric samples were collected from adult patients in 10 NHS hospitals who were receiving routine NG-tube feeding. The sensitivities of the standard and novel pH tests were respectively 49.2% (95% CI 44.1‑54.3%) and 70.2% (95% CI 65.6‑74.8%) under pH cut-off of 5.5 and the novel test has a lung specificity of 89.5% (95% CI 79.6%, 99.4%). Our simulation showed that using the novel test can potentially save 132 unnecessary chest X-rays per check per every 1000 eligible patients, or direct savings of £4034 to the NHS.

conclusionsThe novel pH test correctly identified significantly more patients with tubes located inside the stomach compared to the standard pH test used widely by the NHS.

trial registrationhttp://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11170249 , Registered 21 June 2017-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Diagnostics, Nutrition, NG-tubes, Health economics, Adoption barriers

Identifiers

PMID34903303
PMCPMC8670038
OpenAlexW4200542366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.