Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903196›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Validation of the intolerance of uncertainty scale as a screening tool for perinatal anxiety.

Melissa Furtado, Benicio N Frey, Sheryl M Green

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05691140 (Prevention of Postpartum Anxiety in High-Risk Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05691140 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Postpartum Anxiety in High-Risk Women: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsPostpartum AnxietyArmsCognitive Behavioural Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Application of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Model to Gambling Urge and Involvement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa FurtadoDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Ontario, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada. furtadom@mcmaster.ca.
Benicio N FreyWomen's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Level 1, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3K7, Canada.
Sheryl M GreenWomen's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Level 1, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3K7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there is a significant lack of research validating clinical tools for early and accurate detection of anxiety disorders in perinatal populations. Intolerance of uncertainty was recently identified as a significant risk factor for postpartum anxiety symptoms and is a key trait of non-perinatal anxiety disorders. The present study aimed to validate the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) in a perinatal population and evaluate its use as a screening tool for anxiety disorders.

methodsPsychiatric diagnoses were assessed in a sample of perinatal women (n = 198), in addition to completing a self-report battery of questionnaires. Psychometric properties including internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Determination of an optimal clinical cut-off score was measured through a ROC analysis in which the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

resultsThe IUS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95) and an optimal clinical cut-off score of 64 or greater was established, yielding a sensitivity of 89%. The IUS also demonstrated very good positive (79%) and negative (80%) predictive values.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the IUS represents a clinically useful screening tool to be used as an aid for the early and accurate detection of perinatal anxiety.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersFemaleHumansPeripartum PeriodPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUncertaintyAnxietyIntolerance of uncertaintyPerinatalPostpartumPregnancyScreening

Identifiers

PMID34903196
PMCPMC8670292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.