Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903162›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry. Biokhimiia2021

Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems: Deciphering the Most Complex Prokaryotic Immune System.

Matvey V Kolesnik, Iana Fedorova, Karyna A Karneyeva, Daria N Artamonova, Konstantin V Severinov

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry. Biokhimiia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nature Inspired Delivery Vehicles for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. TheEcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Characterization ofmSphere · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matvey V KolesnikCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia. matveykolesnik@gmail.com.
Iana FedorovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia. femtokot@gmail.com.
Karyna A KarneyevaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia. karyna.karneyeva@skoltech.ru.
Daria N ArtamonovaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia. daria.vorontsova@skolkovotech.ru.
Konstantin V SeverinovCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia. severik@waksman.rutgers.edu.
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RUPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and persistence of selfish genetic elements is an intrinsic feature of all living systems. Cellular organisms have evolved a plethora of elaborate defense systems that limit the spread of such genetic parasites. CRISPR-Cas are RNA-guided defense systems used by prokaryotes to recognize and destroy foreign nucleic acids. These systems acquire and store fragments of foreign nucleic acids and utilize the stored sequences as guides to recognize and destroy genetic invaders. CRISPR-Cas systems have been extensively studied, as some of them are used in various genome editing technologies. Although Type III CRISPR-Cas systems are among the most common CRISPR-Cas systems, they are also some of the least investigated ones, mostly due to the complexity of their action compared to other CRISPR-Cas system types. Type III effector complexes specifically recognize and cleave RNA molecules. The recognition of the target RNA activates the effector large subunit - the so-called CRISPR polymerase - which cleaves DNA and produces small cyclic oligonucleotides that act as signaling molecules to activate auxiliary effectors, notably non-specific RNases. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the sometimes meandering pathway of the Type III CRISPR research. We also review the current data on the structures and activities of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems components, their biological roles, and evolutionary history. Finally, using structural modeling with AlphaFold2, we show that the archaeal HRAMP signature protein, which heretofore has had no assigned function, is a degenerate relative of Type III CRISPR-Cas signature protein Cas10, suggesting that HRAMP systems have descended from Type III CRISPR-Cas systems or their ancestors.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingImmune SystemProkaryotic CellsSignal TransductionCRISPR-Cas Type IIICRISPR evolutioncyclic oligonucleotidesHRAMPprokaryotic immunityRNA-guided defense

Identifiers

PMID34903162
PMCPMC8527444
OpenAlexW3207507531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.