Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34903037›Full record

SynthesisStroke2022

Sex Differences in Presentation of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mariam Ali, Hendrikus J A van Os, Nelleke van der Weerd, Jan W Schoones, Martijn W Heymans, Nyika D Kruyt, Marieke C Visser, Marieke J H Wermer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariam AliDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.A., M.C.V.).ORCID 0000-0003-3409-7835
Hendrikus J A van OsDepartment of Neurology (H.J.A.v.O., N.v.d.W., N.D.K., M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-8608
Nelleke van der WeerdDepartment of Neurology (H.J.A.v.O., N.v.d.W., N.D.K., M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7700-274X
Jan W SchoonesWalaeus Library (J.W.S.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-4781
Martijn W HeymansDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands (M.W.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-3889-0921
Nyika D KruytDepartment of Neurology (H.J.A.v.O., N.v.d.W., N.D.K., M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2320-0932
Marieke C VisserDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.A., M.C.V.).
Marieke J H WermerDepartment of Neurology (H.J.A.v.O., N.v.d.W., N.D.K., M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-9521
Leiden University Medical Center · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLGGD Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWomen have worse outcomes than men after stroke. Differences in presentation may lead to misdiagnosis and, in part, explain these disparities. We investigated whether there are sex differences in clinical presentation of acute stroke or transient ischemic attack.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria were (1) cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, or randomized controlled trial design; (2) admission for (suspicion of) ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack; and (3) comparisons possible between sexes in ≥1 nonfocal or focal acute stroke symptom(s). A random-effects model was used for our analyses. We performed sensitivity and subanalyses to help explain heterogeneity and used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess bias.

resultsWe included 60 studies (n=582 844; 50% women). In women, headache (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.11-1.39]; I

conclusionsThere may be substantive differences in nonfocal and focal stroke symptoms between men and women presenting with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack, but sufficiently high-quality studies are lacking. More studies are needed to address this because sex differences in presentation may lead to misdiagnosis and undertreatment.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesIschemic Attack, TransientMaleSex CharacteristicsStrokeTreatment Outcomediagnostic errorsintracranial hemorrhagesischemic attack, transientischemic strokesex characteristicssigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID34903037
PMCPMC8785516
OpenAlexW4200322685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.