Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34902208›Full record

ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2022

Effect of Amino Acid Substitutions on 70S Ribosomal Binding, Cellular Uptake, and Antimicrobial Activity of Oncocin Onc112.

Lisa Kolano, Daniel Knappe, Angela Berg, Thorsten Berg, Ralf Hoffmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides from Invertebrates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa KolanoInstitute of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Mineralogy, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-2464
Daniel KnappeInstitute of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Mineralogy, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Angela BergInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Universität Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-1407
Thorsten BergInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Universität Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-7696
Ralf HoffmannInstitute of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Mineralogy, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-5646
Bioanalytica (Switzerland) · CHLeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides (PrAMPs) are promising candidates for the treatment of infections caused by high-priority human pathogens. Their mode of action consists of (I) passive diffusion across the outer membrane, (II) active transport through the inner membrane, and (III) inhibition of protein biosynthesis by blocking the exit tunnel of the 70S ribosome. We tested whether in vitro data on ribosomal binding and bacterial uptake could predict the antibacterial activity of PrAMPs against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Ribosomal binding and bacterial uptake rates were measured for 47 derivatives of PrAMP Onc112 and compared to the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of each peptide. Ribosomal binding was evaluated for ribosome extracts from four Gram-negative bacteria. Bacterial uptake was assessed by quantifying each peptide in the supernatants of bacterial cultures. Oncocin analogues with a higher net positive charge appeared to be more active, although their ribosome binding and uptake rates were not necessarily better than for Onc112. The data suggest a complex mode of action influenced by further factors improving or reducing the antibacterial activity, including diffusion through membranes, transport mechanism, secondary targets, off-target binding, intracellular distribution, and membrane effects. Relying only on in vitro binding and uptake data may not be sufficient for the rational development of more active analogues.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesRibosomesAmino Acid SubstitutionMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic Peptidesoncocinfluorescence polarization (FP)label-free quantitationOnc112oncocinproline-rich antimicrobial peptide (PrAMP)

Identifiers

PMID34902208
PMCPMC9306569
OpenAlexW4200213235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.