Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34902093›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Extent, pattern, and prognostic value of MGMT promotor methylation: does it differ between glioblastoma and IDH-wildtype/TERT-mutated astrocytoma?

Nico Teske, Philipp Karschnia, Jonathan Weller, Sebastian Siller, Mario M Dorostkar, Jochen Herms, Louisa von Baumgarten, Joerg Christian Tonn, Niklas Thon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correlations ofMolecular and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nico Teske *Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany. Nico.Teske@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-7994
Philipp Karschnia *Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Jonathan WellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian SillerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Mario M DorostkarGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jochen HermsGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Louisa von BaumgartenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Joerg Christian TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Niklas ThonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe cIMPACT-NOW update 6 first introduced glioblastoma diagnosis based on the combination of IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) status and TERT promotor mutation (pTERTmut). In glioblastoma as defined by histopathology according to the WHO 2016 classification, MGMT promotor status is associated with outcome. Whether this is also true in glioblastoma defined by molecular markers is yet unclear.

methodsWe searched the institutional database for patients with: (1) glioblastoma defined by histopathology; and (2) IDHwt astrocytoma with pTERTmut. MGMT promotor methylation was analysed using methylation-specific PCR and Sanger sequencing of CpG sites within the MGMT promotor region.

resultsWe identified 224 patients with glioblastoma diagnosed based on histopathology, and 54 patients with IDHwt astrocytoma with pTERTmut (19 astrocytomas WHO grade II and 38 astrocytomas WHO grade III). There was no difference in the number of MGMT methylated tumors between the two cohorts as determined per PCR, and also neither the number nor the pattern of methylated CpG sites differed as determined per Sanger sequencing. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was similar between the two cohorts when treated with radio- or chemotherapy. In both cohorts, higher numbers of methylated CpG sites were associated with favourable outcome.

conclusionsExtent and pattern of methylated CpG sites are similar in glioblastoma and IDHwt astrocytoma with pTERTmut. In both tumor entities, higher numbers of methylated CpG sites appear associated with more favourable outcome. Evaluation in larger prospective cohorts is warranted.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGlioblastomaTumor Suppressor ProteinsDNA MethylationHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticTelomeraseDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinscIMPACTGliomaIDH wildtypeTERTWHO CNS 2021

Identifiers

PMID34902093
PMCPMC8816375
OpenAlexW4200464615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.