Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34902059›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

How lesions at different locations along the visual pathway influence pupillary reactions to chromatic stimuli.

Carina Kelbsch, Krunoslav Stingl, Ronja Jung, Melanie Kempf, Paul Richter, Torsten Strasser, Tobias Peters, Barbara Wilhelm, Helmut Wilhelm, Felix Tonagel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carina KelbschUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Krunoslav StinglUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. Krunoslav.stingl@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8547-7593
Ronja JungUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Melanie KempfUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Paul RichterUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Torsten StrasserUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tobias PetersPupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Barbara WilhelmPupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Helmut WilhelmUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Felix TonagelUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
STZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine systematically how prechiasmal, chiasmal, and postchiasmal lesions along the visual pathway affect the respective pupillary responses to specific local monochromatic stimuli.

methodsChromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) was performed in three patient groups (10 subjects with status after anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, 6 with chiasmal lesions, and 12 with optic tract or occipital lobe lesions (tumor, ischemia)) using red, low-intensity red, and blue local stimuli within the central 30° visual field. Affected areas - as determined by visual field defects revealed using conventional static perimetry - were compared with non-affected areas. Outcome parameters were the relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA) and the latency to constriction onset of the pupillary responses.

resultsA statistically significant relMCA reduction was observed in the affected areas of postchiasmal lesions with red (p = 0.004) and low-intensity red stimulation (p = 0.001). RelMCA reduction in the affected areas seemed more pronounced for low-intensity red stimulation (46.5% mean reduction compared to non-affected areas; 36% for red stimulation), however statistically not significant. In prechiasmal lesions, a statistically significant latency prolongation could be demonstrated in the affected areas with low-intensity red stimulation (p = 0.015).

conclusionOur results indicate that the choice of stimulus characteristics is relevant in detecting defects in the pupillary pathway of impairment along the visual pathway, favoring red stimuli of low intensity over blue stimuli. Such knowledge opens the door for further fundamental research in pupillary pathways and is important for future clinical application of pupillography in neuro-ophthalmologic patients.

Indexed as

Pupil DisordersVisual PathwaysHumansPhotic StimulationPupilReflex, PupillaryVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsChiasmChromatic pupil campimetryCPCNeuro-ophthalmologyPupillometryVisual pathway

Identifiers

PMID34902059
PMCPMC9007757
OpenAlexW4200294385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.