Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34902025›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Hematological and immunological responses to naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease in newly received beef calves in a commercial stocker farm.

Afroza Akter, James M Caldwell, Gina M Pighetti, Elizabeth A Shepherd, Chika C Okafor, Elizabeth A Eckelkamp, J Lannett Edwards, Liesel G Schneider

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Afroza AkterDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
James M CaldwellDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Gina M PighettiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Elizabeth A ShepherdDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Chika C OkaforDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Elizabeth A EckelkampDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
J Lannett EdwardsDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Liesel G SchneiderDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-6495
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture NC1192U.S. Department of Agriculture NC1192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to determine temporal changes in hematological and immune parameters in response to naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in commercially managed stocker calves. Forty newly weaned beef steers purchased from auction markets were housed at a commercial stocker operation in Crossville, TN. Blood samples, rectal temperature, and thoracic ultrasonography (TUS; 1: normal to 3: severe) were collected on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. Castration status (FC: freshly castrated; PC: previously castrated) was determined on arrival based on presence of a fresh castration site at the scrotum. Calves received antibiotics for BRD based on clinical severity scoring (CSS; 0: moribund, 4: moribund) and rectal temperature. Complete blood counts (CBC) were performed. Calves were categorized based on the number of treatments (NumTrt) received (0x, 1x, and 2x). Temporal variations in CBC and immune parameters were analyzed using mixed model repeated measure ANOVA (Proc GLIMMIX; SAS 9.4). Variation of CBCs and immune parameters based on TUS was determined using mixed model ANOVA. There was a NumTrt by day interaction effect on the responses of white blood cells (WBC) (P = 0.04) and haptoglobin (HPT) (P = 0.04). On day 21, WBC were greater in the 2x NumTrt group than other groups, but there were no differences in WBC between NumTrt levels on other days. Haptoglobin was greater in the 2x group on days 14 and 21 than 0x or 1x. Red blood cells (RBC) (P = 0.02) and WBC (P = 0.04) differed between FC and PC groups, and lower RBC and WBC were observed in the FC group. A castration status × day effect for mean corpuscular volume (MCV; P = 0.04) was observed where FC group had higher MCV at days 14 and 21 than the PC group. Tumor necrosis factor-α differed based on NumTrt (P = 0.03) and higher concentrations were found in 2x group. We observed a day effect for IL-1β (P = 0.009) and TNF-α (P = 0.001). Significant effect of TUS on HPT at day 14 (P = 0.0004) and day 21 (P = 0.002) was observed. Combining HPT and platelet explained 15% of the variability in treatment status on a given day, whereas HPT and hemoglobin explained 10% of the variability in lung consolidation status. Although hematological and immunological parameters varied largely in our study, the potential of combining HPT with hematological variables should be studied further. Results from this study would help in understanding temporal changes in CBC and immune parameters in newly received stocker cattle.

Indexed as

Bovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattle DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesAnimalsCattleFarmsHaptoglobinsMaleWeaningHaptoglobinsbovine respiratory diseasehealthhematologyimmunologystocker cattlethoracic ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34902025
PMCPMC8846332
OpenAlexW4200426942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.