Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34901798›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Rehabilitation needs following COVID-19: Five-month post-discharge clinical follow-up of individuals with concerning self-reported symptoms.

Carl Wahlgren, Anestis Divanoglou, Melanie Larsson, Emma Nilsson, Åse Östholm Balkhed, Katarina Niward, Ulrika Birberg Thornberg, Eva Lilliecreutz Gudmundsson, Richard Levi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rehabilitation and COVID-19: systematic review by Cochrane Rehabilitation.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post-Acute COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurocognitive challenges Post-COVID: current perspectives and future solutions.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applying the WHO ICF framework to long COVID patients with persistent respiratory symptoms.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carl WahlgrenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Anestis DivanoglouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Melanie LarssonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Emma NilssonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Åse Östholm BalkhedDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Katarina NiwardDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Ulrika Birberg ThornbergDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Eva Lilliecreutz GudmundssonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.
Richard LeviDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping S-58185, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis report describes and objectivizes reported problems among a cohort of previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients by clinical examination and determination of the required level of rehabilitation sevices.

methodsThis report forms part of the Linköping COVID-19 Study (LinCoS) that included 745 individuals from one of 21 Swedish healthcare regions, Region Östergötland (RÖ), admitted to hospital for COVID-19 during March 1st-May 31st, 2020. In this descriptive ambidirectional cohort study, all 185 individuals who had reported concerning persisting symptoms were invited to a multi-professional clinical assessment of somatic, functional, affective, neuropsychological status and rehabilitation needs. Rehabilitation needs were assessed using three sub-scales of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended.

findingsAmong the 158 (85·4%) cases consenting and included in the analysis, we found a broad array of symptoms and signs attributable to COVID-19 involving respiratory, visual, auditory, motor, sensory and cognitive functions that could be confirmed clinically at five months post-discharge. This translated into 16% [95% CI 13-20] of survivors (70/433) of the total regional cohort of hospitalised patients requiring further rehabilitative interventions at follow-up. Weakness in extremities was reported in 28·5% [21·6, 36·2] (45/158). On examination, clinically overt muscle weakness could be corroborated in 15 individuals (10·5%) [6·1, 16·4]. 48% [40, 56] (76/158) reported cognitive symptoms, while the physician noted overt cognitive impairments in only 3% [1·1, 7·5]. In neuropsychological testing, 37% [28-46] (45/122) performed 1.5 SD below the norm, indicating neurocognitive deficits. Fifty-five individuals (34·8%) [27·4, 42·8] reported new or aggravated pain. In three fourths of them, it exerted a 'moderate' or worse detrimental effect on their ability to work.

interpretationOur study underscores the importance of providing extensive examination of cases with persisting problems after COVID-19, especially since symptoms such as fatigue and breathlessness are highly nonspecific, but may represent significant underlying functional impairments. Robust neurocognitive testing should be performed, as cognitive problems may easily be overlooked during routine medical consultation. In the Swedish context, most rehabilitative interventions could be provided in a primary care setting. A substantial minority of patients should be triaged to specialized rehabilitation services.

Indexed as

ConsequencesLong-term follow-upPACSPost-COVID-19RehabilitationResidual symptomsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34901798
PMCPMC8645256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.