Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34901469›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2021

Exception from informed consent trials: social-media-based community consultation campaigns are representative of target communities.

Paige Farley, Shannon W Stephens, Brandon Crowley, Sean P Collins, Monica D Wong, Ashley B Panas, Bradley M Dennis, Neal Richmond, Kenji Inaba, Karen N Brown and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exception From Informed Consent Community Consultation Surveys-Do Respondent Characteristics Accurately Reflect Targeted Communities?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paige FarleyCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-601X
Shannon W StephensCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Brandon CrowleyCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Monica D WongDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-9518
Ashley B PanasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bradley M DennisDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Neal RichmondDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kenji InabaDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Karen N BrownCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
John B HolcombCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Jan O JansenCenter for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-4398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Community consultation' (CC) is a key step when conducting Exception From Informed Consent research. Social-media-based CC has been shown to reach more people than traditional methods, but it is unclear whether those reached are representative of the community as a whole.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of the CC performed in preparation for the PHOXSTAT trial. Social media advertisement campaigns were conducted in the catchment areas of the three participating trauma centers and evaluated by examining Facebook user statistics. We compared these data to georeferenced population data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. We examined variations in the proportion of each age group reached, by gender.

resultsOur social media advertisements reached a total of 332 081 individuals in Los Angeles, Birmingham, and Nashville. Although there were differences in the proportion of individuals reached within each age group and gender groups, compared with the population in each area, these were small (within 5%). In Birmingham, participants 55 to 64 years old, 25 to 34 years old, and females 18 to 24 years old were slightly over-represented (a larger proportion of individuals in this age group were reached by the social media campaign, compared with the population resident in this area). In contrast, in Nashville, female participants 45 to 64 years old, and males 25 to 64 years old were over-represented. In Los Angeles, females 45 to 64 years old, and males 25 to 64 years and over were over-represented. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that social media CC campaigns can be used to reach a sample of the community broadly representative of the population as a whole, in terms of age and gender. This finding is helpful to IRBs and investigators, as it lends further support to the use of social media to conduct CC. Further work is needed to analyze how representative community samples are in terms of other characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Economic & Value-based Evaluations.

Indexed as

emergency treatmentethicsinformed consent

Identifiers

PMID34901469
PMCPMC8634012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.