ReviewBMJ open ophthalmology2021
Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review.
Review in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04439552 (Neuroplasticity of Pain Pathways and Corneal Afferent Regeneration Following Corneal Crosslinking), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neuroplasticity of Pain Pathways and Corneal Afferent Regeneration Following Corneal Crosslinking (CXL) in Keratoconus
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observation and assessment of the immediate use of a silicon hydrogel contact lens after transepithelial corneal cross linking: a prospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Corneal Innervation Research at a Crossroads: A Tool-Driven Roadmap for the Future.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Review
- Postoperative Pain and Functional Limitations After Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Patient-Reported Outcome Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Can Insulin Drops Accelerate Corneal Healing After Corneal Cross-Linking? A Preliminary Case Series.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Impact of Corneal Crosslinking on Endothelial and Biomechanical Parameters in Keratoconus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of the effect of calcium ions on promoting the penetrability of riboflavin into the corneal stroma by iontophoresis.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- "Outcomes of Iontophoresis Cross-Linking in Asymmetric Keratoconus: A Retrospective Analysis of High Visual Acuity Eyes Under 25 Years Old".Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- [Resolution of the Federal Joint Committee on the mandatory introduction and implementation of acute pain management concepts-Importance and consequences for ophthalmology].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Keratoconus Diagnosis and Treatment: Recent Advances and Future Directions.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- A New Postoperative Regimen after CXL and PRK Using Topical NSAID and Steroids on the Open Ocular Surface.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Opinion: Is Pain an Overlooked Patient Outcome? Elevating Post-Operative Pain Above a Footnote.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an increasingly available and effective treatment for keratoconus, few reports have considered its impact on pain-related physiology in depth. This comprehensive narrative review summarises mechanisms underlying pain in CXL and clinical care possibilities, with the goal of future improvement in management of CXL-related pain. Postoperative pain associated with CXL is largely due to primary afferent nerve injury and, to a smaller extent, inflammation. Chronification of pain after CXL has not been reported, even as long-term nerve damage without regeneration following standard CXL treatment is frequently observed. The lack of pain chronification may be due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, with its rapidly recovering superficial corneal wound, and to the positive anti-inflammatory changes of the tear film that have been described after CXL. Different CXL approaches have been developed, with the transepithelial epithelial-on technique (epi-on) associated with less postsurgical pain than the gold standard, epithelial-off technique (epi-off). After the first few days, however, the difference in pain scores and need for analgesics between epi-on and epi-off disappear. Patients experience relatively high-intensity pain the first few days post-CXL, and many strategies for acute pain control following CXL have been studied. Currently, no method of pain management is considered superior or universally accepted. Acute pain following CXL is a recognised and clinically significant side effect, but few CXL studies have systematically investigated postoperative pain and its management. This review aims to improve patient pain outcomes following this increasingly common procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.