Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34901412›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2021

From the Patient's Perspective: Orthopedic Virtual Rounds.

Tonya Moyse, Erica Yates, Virgilio Fajardo, Jordan Glorioso-Wible, Jonathan L Schaffer, Lukas M Nystrom, Sandra L Siedlecki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tonya MoyseCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-4126
Erica YatesCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Virgilio FajardoCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jordan Glorioso-WibleCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jonathan L SchafferCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lukas M NystromCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sandra L SiedleckiCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interdisciplinary rounding on hospital inpatients is an integral part of providing high-quality, safe patient care. As orthopedic groups have grown and geographic coverage increased, surgeons are challenged to make in-person rounds on their patients every day given time constraints and physical distances. Virtual technology is being used in multiple healthcare settings to provide patients with the opportunity to connect with health care professionals when in-person options are not available. The purpose of this study was to explore the patient experience of virtual inpatient rounding. Using digital communication technology, virtual rounds were conducted by having the surgeon connect via their mobile device or laptop to the nursing unit's communication tablet. Twenty-seven patient interviews were digitally recorded and qualitatively analyzed. Results demonstrated that virtual rounds provided a positive patient experience for many. Most patients felt that virtual rounds were a good alternative when in-person rounds are not possible. Dissatisfaction was related to feeling "rushed" by the surgeon. This feedback can be used to better prepare patients and providers for virtual rounds and to enhance virtual technologies.

Indexed as

communicationhealth information technologyinterprofessional communicationpatient expectationspatient feedbackpatient perspectives/narrativesteam communicationteam rounding

Identifiers

PMID34901412
PMCPMC8655446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.