ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2021
Prediction of locations in medical images using orthogonal neural networks.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeAn orthogonal neural network (ONN), a new deep-learning structure for medical image localization, is developed and presented in this paper. This method is simple, efficient, and completely different from a convolution neural network (CNN). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe diagnostic performance of ONN for detecting the location of pneumothorax in chest X-rays was assessed and compared to that of CNN. In addition, ONN and CNN were applied to predict the location of the glottis in laryngeal images.
resultsAn area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.870, an accuracy of 85.3%, a sensitivity of 75.0%, and a specificity of 86.5% were achieved by applying ONN to detect the location of pneumothorax in chest X-rays; the ONN outperformed the CNN. By applying ONN to predict the location of the glottis in laryngeal images, we achieved the accurate prediction rate of 70.5% and the adjacent prediction rate of 20.5%.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that an ONN can be used as a quick selection criterion to compare fully-connected small artificial neural network (ANN) models for image localization. The time it took to train an ONN was about 10% of the time using a CNN on images of a given input resolution. Our approach could accurately predict locations in medical images, reduce the time delay in diagnosing urgent diseases, and increase the effectiveness of clinical practice and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.