Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34901317›Full record

ReviewTemperature (Austin, Tex.)2021

Neuroimaging of pleasantness and unpleasantness induced by thermal stimuli.

Adriana Banozic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Temperature (Austin, Tex.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Human thermal perception and time of day: A review.Temperature (Austin, Tex.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adriana BanozicYLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-4468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional brain imaging techniques provide unique insight into the process of human thermal regulation and its associated hedonics. Similar neuroimaging techniques have predominantly focused on the neural characterization of thermal response separately from hedonics. In this instance, there is a gap in the understanding of hedonics related to regional brain activations. Responses to localized, thermal stimuli are yet to be characterized, but it would appear that thermoregulatory regions are widely distributed throughout the hemispheres of the human brain. The distributed nature of neural activations related to temperature responses is consistent with multiple related functions contributing to thermoregulation. Estimating hedonics of thermal stimulation includes a cognitive process that could potentially interfere with identifying activation specific to hedonics. A future challenge for brain imaging studies is to more accurately dissect the functional neuroanatomy of thermoregulation and related hedonics in hemispheric regions.

Indexed as

contact heatFunctional magnetic resonance imaginghedonicshumanposterior cingulate cortex

Identifiers

PMID34901317
PMCPMC8654474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.