ReviewSkin appendage disorders2021
Trichodynia Revisited.
Review in Skin appendage disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Sensitive Scalp and Trichodynia: Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Skin appendage disorders · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trichodynia refers to the painful sensation of the scalp related to the complaint of hair loss. Originally suggested to be distinguishing for telogen effluvium and related to hair loss activity and follicular inflammation, further studies have found trichodynia to be common in androgenetic alopecia as well and coexisting with psychopathologic findings. The respective studies failed to demonstrate correlations between trichodynia and quantifiable hair loss activity, nor histopathologic evidence for follicular inflammation. A symptomatic scalp is a frequent condition in specific dermatological conditions of the scalp. By definition of exclusion, we are not dealing with trichodynia in these cases. It is conceivable that neuropeptides are key players between the central nervous system and the skin immune and microvascular system. Such mechanisms would explain the noxious effects of both external stimuli and emotional distress in eliciting cutaneous nociception. Since we have begun to understand the diverse etiologies of trichodynia, and a single term does not measure up to this circumstance, it may be wiser to describe the condition depending on the type of scalp sensation and its specific disease association. Further studies are warranted into the neural/endothelial/follicular interactions both in hair growth and shedding and the psychosomatic diseases of the hair and scalp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.