Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34901162›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021

LigD: A Structural Guide to the Multi-Tool of Bacterial Non-Homologous End Joining.

Benhur Amare, Anthea Mo, Noorisah Khan, Dana J Sowa, Monica M Warner, Andriana Tetenych, Sara N Andres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Base-excision restriction enzymes: expanding the world of epigenetic immune systems.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benhur AmareDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Anthea MoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Noorisah KhanDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dana J SowaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Monica M WarnerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andriana TetenychDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sara N AndresDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks are the most lethal form of damage for living organisms. The non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway can repair these breaks without the use of a DNA template, making it a critical repair mechanism when DNA is not replicating, but also a threat to genome integrity. NHEJ requires proteins to anchor the DNA double-strand break, recruit additional repair proteins, and then depending on the damage at the DNA ends, fill in nucleotide gaps or add or remove phosphate groups before final ligation. In eukaryotes, NHEJ uses a multitude of proteins to carry out processing and ligation of the DNA double-strand break. Bacterial NHEJ, though, accomplishes repair primarily with only two proteins-Ku and LigD. While Ku binds the initial break and recruits LigD, it is LigD that is the primary DNA end processing machinery. Up to three enzymatic domains reside within LigD, dependent on the bacterial species. These domains are a polymerase domain, to fill in nucleotide gaps with a preference for ribonucleotide addition; a phosphoesterase domain, to generate a 3'-hydroxyl DNA end; and the ligase domain, to seal the phosphodiester backbone. To date, there are no experimental structures of wild-type LigD, but there are x-ray and nuclear magnetic resonance structures of the individual enzymatic domains from different bacteria and archaea, along with structural predictions of wild-type LigD via AlphaFold. In this review, we will examine the structures of the independent domains of LigD from different bacterial species and the contributions these structures have made to understanding the NHEJ repair mechanism. We will then examine how the experimental structures of the individual LigD enzymatic domains combine with structural predictions of LigD from different bacterial species and postulate how LigD coordinates multiple enzymatic activities to carry out DNA double-strand break repair in bacteria.

Indexed as

DNA double-strand breakligaseLigDnon-homologous end joiningphosphoesterasepolymeraseprotein structure and function

Identifiers

PMID34901162
PMCPMC8656161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.