ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
PCNA in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer: An Interaction Network Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Cancer-Associated PCNA with AOH1996 Induces Mitotic Catastrophe and Enhances Cisplatin Therapy in Cervical Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-invasive host transcriptome and HPV oncogene expression map the molecular landscape of HPV-driven cervical lesions.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for efferocytosis-associated genes in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Primary lymphoma of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and integrated analysis of case reports and series.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Identification of a potent PCNA-p15-interaction inhibitor by autodisplay-based peptide library screening.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- A FRET-Based Assay for the Identification of PCNA Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The identification of a two-gene prognostic model based on cisplatin resistance-related ceRNA network in small cell lung cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- Primary Melanoma of the Cervix Uteri: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Reported Cases.Biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Identification of candidate hub genes correlated with the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis of prostate cancer by integrated bioinformatics analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Gene Expression Profiles of the Aging Rat Hippocampus Imply Altered Immunoglobulin Dynamics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The investigation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their interactome could provide valuable insights for the development of markers to optimize cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) screening and treatment. This study investigated patients with cervical disease to identify gene markers whose dysregulated expression and protein interaction interface were linked with CIN and cervical cancer (CC). Literature search of microarray datasets containing cervical epithelial samples was conducted in Gene Expression Omnibus and Pubmed/Medline from inception until March 2021. Retrieved DEGs were used to construct two protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Module DEGs that overlapped between CIN and CC samples, were ranked based on 11 topological algorithms. The highest-ranked hub gene was retrieved and its correlation with prognosis, tissue expression and tumor purity in patients with CC, was evaluated. Screening of the literature yielded 9 microarray datasets (GSE7803, GSE27678, GSE63514, GSE6791, GSE9750, GSE29570, GSE39001, GSE63678, GSE67522). Two PPI networks from CIN and CC samples were constructed and consisted of 1704 and 3748 DEGs along 21393 and 79828 interactions, respectively. Two gene clusters were retrieved in the CIN network and three in the CC network. Multi-algorithmic topological analysis revealed PCNA as the highest ranked hub gene between the two networks, both in terms of expression and interactions. Further analysis revealed that while PCNA was overexpressed in CC tissues, it was correlated with favorable prognosis (log-rank P=0.022, HR=0.58) and tumor purity (P=9.86 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.