Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900731›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

PCNA in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer: An Interaction Network Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes.

Panagiotis Giannos, Konstantinos S Kechagias, Sarah Bowden, Neha Tabassum, Maria Paraskevaidi, Maria Kyrgiou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A FRET-Based Assay for the Identification of PCNA Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiotis GiannosSociety of Meta-Research and Biomedical Innovation, Cancer Research Working Group, London, United Kingdom.
Konstantinos S KechagiasSociety of Meta-Research and Biomedical Innovation, Cancer Research Working Group, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah BowdenDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Neha TabassumDepartment of Life Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ParaskevaidiDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maria KyrgiouDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBNational Health Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their interactome could provide valuable insights for the development of markers to optimize cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) screening and treatment. This study investigated patients with cervical disease to identify gene markers whose dysregulated expression and protein interaction interface were linked with CIN and cervical cancer (CC). Literature search of microarray datasets containing cervical epithelial samples was conducted in Gene Expression Omnibus and Pubmed/Medline from inception until March 2021. Retrieved DEGs were used to construct two protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Module DEGs that overlapped between CIN and CC samples, were ranked based on 11 topological algorithms. The highest-ranked hub gene was retrieved and its correlation with prognosis, tissue expression and tumor purity in patients with CC, was evaluated. Screening of the literature yielded 9 microarray datasets (GSE7803, GSE27678, GSE63514, GSE6791, GSE9750, GSE29570, GSE39001, GSE63678, GSE67522). Two PPI networks from CIN and CC samples were constructed and consisted of 1704 and 3748 DEGs along 21393 and 79828 interactions, respectively. Two gene clusters were retrieved in the CIN network and three in the CC network. Multi-algorithmic topological analysis revealed PCNA as the highest ranked hub gene between the two networks, both in terms of expression and interactions. Further analysis revealed that while PCNA was overexpressed in CC tissues, it was correlated with favorable prognosis (log-rank P=0.022, HR=0.58) and tumor purity (P=9.86 × 10

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical diseasecervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCINgene biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34900731
PMCPMC8661029
OpenAlexW3215350629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.